The Livonian War (1558-1583) for the right to possess the territories and possessions of Livonia (a historical region on the territory of the modern Latvian and Estonian republics) began as a war between Russia and the Livonian Knightly Order, which later spilled over into a war between Russia, Sweden and.
The prerequisite for the war was the Russian-Livonian negotiations, which ended in 1554 with the signing of a peace treaty for a period of 15 years. According to this agreement, Livonia was obliged to pay an annual tribute to the Russian Tsar for the city of Dorpat (modern Tartu, originally known as Yuriev), since it previously belonged to the Russian princes, the heirs of Ivan IV. Under the pretext of paying Yuryev tribute later than the deadline, the tsar declared war on Livonia in January 1558.
Causes of the Livonian War
As for the true reasons for declaring war on Livonia by Ivan IV, two possible versions are expressed. The first version was proposed in the 50s of the 19th century by Russian historian Sergei Solovyov, who presented Ivan the Terrible as the predecessor of Peter the Great in his intentions to seize the Baltic port, thereby establishing unhindered economic (trade) relations with European countries. Until 1991, this version remained the main one in Russian and Soviet historiography, and some Swedish and Danish scholars also agreed with it.
However, starting from the 60s of the 20th century, the assumption that Ivan IV was driven solely by economic (trade) interest in the Livonian War was severely criticized. Critics pointed out that, in justifying military operations in Livonia, the tsar never referred to the need for unhindered trade relations with Europe. Instead, he spoke of heritage rights, calling Livonia his fiefdom. An alternative explanation, proposed by the German historian Norbert Angermann (1972) and supported by scholar Erik Tyberg (1984) and some Russian scholars in the 1990s, notably Filyushkin (2001), emphasizes the tsar's desire to expand spheres of influence and consolidate his power.
Most likely, Ivan IV started the war without any strategic plans. He simply wanted to punish the Livonians and force them to pay tribute and fulfill all the conditions of the peace treaty. Initial success encouraged the tsar to conquer the entire territory of Livonia, but here his interests clashed with those of Sweden and the Commonwealth, turning the local conflict into a long and exhausting war between the greatest powers of the Baltic region.
The main periods of the Livonian War
As hostilities developed, Ivan IV changed allies, the picture of hostilities also changed. Thus, four main periods can be distinguished in the Livonian War.
- From 1558 to 1561 - the period of the initial successful operations of the Russians in Livonia;
- 1560s - a period of confrontation with the Commonwealth and peaceful relations with Sweden;
- From 1570 to 1577 - the last attempts of Ivan IV to conquer Livonia;
- From 1578 to 1582 - the attacks of Sweden and the Commonwealth, forcing Ivan IV to liberate the Livonian lands he had captured and proceed to peace negotiations.
The first victories of the Russian army
In 1558, the Russian army, without encountering serious resistance from the Livonian army, on May 11th took an important port located on the Narva River, and after that on July 19th conquered the city of Dorpat. After a long truce, which lasted from March to November 1559, in 1560 the Russian army made another attempt to attack Livonia. On August 2, the main army of the Order was defeated near Ermes (modern Ergeme), and on August 30, the Russian army, led by Prince Andrei Kurbsky, took Fellin Castle (modern Viljandi Castle).
When the fall of the weakened Livonian Order became obvious, the knightly society and the Livonian cities began to seek support from the Baltic countries - the Principality of Lithuania, Denmark and Sweden. In 1561, the country was divided: the last landmaster of the Order, Gotthard Ketler, became a subject of Sigismund II Augustus, the Polish king and Grand Duke of Lithuania, and proclaimed the sovereignty of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania over the destroyed Order. At the same time, the northern part of Livonia, including the city of Reval (modern Tallinn), was occupied by Swedish troops. Sigismund II was the main rival of Ivan IV in the Livonian War, therefore, in an attempt to unite with King Eric XIV of Sweden, the tsar declared war on the Principality of Lithuania in 1562. A huge Russian army, led by the Tsar himself, began the siege of Polotsk, a city on the eastern border of the Principality of Lithuania, and captured it on February 15, 1563. In the next few years, the Lithuanian army was able to take revenge, winning two battles in 1564 and capturing two minor fortresses in 1568, but it failed to achieve decisive successes in the war.
Tipping point: victories turn to defeat
By the beginning of the 70s of the 16th century, the international situation had changed again: a coup d'etat in Sweden (Eric XIV was deposed by his brother John III) put an end to the Russian-Swedish alliance; Poland and Lithuania, united in 1569 into the Commonwealth state, on the contrary, adhered to a peaceful policy due to the illness of King Sigismund II Augustus, who died in 1579, and periods of interregnum (1572-1573, 1574-1575).
Due to these circumstances, Ivan IV tried to oust the Swedish army from the territory of northern Livonia: the Russian army and the royal subject, the Danish prince Magnus (brother of Frederick II, king of Denmark), conducted a siege of the city of Reval for 30 weeks (from August 21, 1570 March 16, 1571), but in vain.
The alliance with the Danish king showed its complete failure, and the raids of the Crimean Tatars, such as, for example, the burning of Moscow by Khan Davlet I Gerai on May 24, 1571, forced the king to postpone military operations in Livonia for several years.
In 1577, Ivan IV made his last attempt to conquer Livonia. Russian troops occupied the entire territory of the country with the exception of the cities of Reval and Riga. The following year, the war reached its final stage, fatal for Russia in the Livonian War.
Defeat of Russian troops
In 1578, the Russian troops were defeated by the joint efforts of the armies of the Commonwealth and Sweden near the Wenden fortress (modern Cesis fortress), after which the royal subject, Prince Magnus, joined the Polish army. In 1579, the Polish king Stefan Batory, a talented general, laid siege to Polotsk again; in the following year, he invaded Russia and ravaged the Pskov region, capturing the fortresses of Velizh and Usvyat and subjecting Velikie Luki to devastating fire. During the third campaign against Russia in August 1581, Batory began the siege of Pskov; the garrison under the leadership of the Russian prince Ivan Shuisky repulsed 31 attacks.
At the same time, Swedish troops captured Narva. On January 15, 1582, Ivan IV signed the Yamzapolsky peace treaty near the town of Zapolsky Yam, which ended the war with the Commonwealth. Ivan IV renounced the territories in Livonia, Polotsk and Velizh (Veliky Luki was returned to the Russian kingdom). In 1583, a peace treaty was signed with Sweden, according to which the Russian cities of Yam, Ivangorod and Koporye passed to the Swedes.
Results of the Livonian War
The defeat in the Livonian War was devastating for the foreign policy of Ivan IV, it weakened the position of Russia in front of its western and northern neighbors, the war had a detrimental effect on the northwestern regions of the country.
Formal reasons were found to start the war (see below), but the true reasons were the geopolitical need for Russia to gain access to the Baltic Sea, as the most convenient for direct ties with the centers of European civilizations, as well as the desire to take an active part in the division of the territory of the Livonian an order, the progressive disintegration of which was becoming obvious, but which, not wanting the strengthening of Russia, prevented its external contacts. For example, the authorities of Livonia did not allow more than a hundred specialists from Europe, invited by Ivan IV, to pass through their lands. Some of them were imprisoned and executed.
The presence of such a hostile barrier did not suit Moscow, which was striving to break out of continental isolation. However, Russia owned a small segment of the Baltic coast, from the Neva basin to Ivangorod. But it was strategically vulnerable, and there were no ports or developed infrastructure. So Ivan the Terrible hoped to use the transport system of Livonia. He considered it an ancient Russian fiefdom, illegally seized by the crusaders.
The forceful solution of the problem predetermined the defiant behavior of the Livonians themselves, who, even according to their own historians, acted imprudently. The reason for the aggravation of relations was the mass pogroms of Orthodox churches in Livonia. Outraged, Grozny sent a message to the authorities of the Order, in which he stated that he would not tolerate such actions. A whip was attached to the letter, as a symbol of imminent punishment. By that time, the truce between Moscow and Livonia had expired (concluded in 1504 as a result of the Russian-Lithuanian war of 1500-1503). To extend it, the Russian side demanded the payment of the Yuryev tribute, which the Livonians pledged to pay back to Ivan III, but for 50 years they never collected it. Recognizing the need to pay it, they again failed to fulfill their obligations. Then in 1558 Russian troops entered Livonia. Thus began the Livonian War. It lasted a quarter of a century, becoming the longest and one of the most difficult in the history of Russia.
Livonian War (1558-1583)
The Livonian War can be roughly divided into four stages. The first one (1558-1561) is directly related to the Russian-Livonian war. The second (1562-1569) included primarily the Russo-Lithuanian war. The third (1570-1576) was distinguished by the resumption of the Russian struggle for Livonia, where they, together with the Danish prince Magnus, fought against the Swedes. The fourth (1577-1583) is associated primarily with the Russian-Polish war. During this period, the Russo-Swedish war continued.
In the middle of the XVI century. Livonia was not a significant military force capable of seriously resisting the Russian state. Its main military asset remained powerful stone fortresses. But formidable for arrows and stones, knightly castles were by that time no longer very capable of protecting their inhabitants from the power of heavy siege weapons. Therefore, military operations in Livonia were reduced mainly to the fight against fortresses, in which the Russian artillery, which had already shown itself in the Kazan case, distinguished itself. The first fortress to fall from the onslaught of the Russians was Narva.
Capture of Narva (1558).
In April 1558, Russian troops led by governors Adashev, Basmanov and Buturlin laid siege to Narva. The fortress was defended by a garrison under the command of the knight Focht Schnellenberg. The decisive assault on Narva took place on 11 May. On this day, a fire broke out in the city, which was accompanied by a storm. According to legend, it arose due to the fact that drunken Livonians threw an Orthodox icon of the Virgin into the fire. Taking advantage of the fact that the guards left the fortifications, the Russians rushed to the assault. They broke through the gates and took possession of the lower city. Having seized the guns located there, the attackers opened fire on the upper castle, preparing the stairs for the attack. But it did not follow, because by the evening the defenders of the castle surrendered, pronouncing the condition of a free exit from the city.
It was the first major fortress taken by the Russians in the Livonian War. Narva was a convenient sea harbor through which direct relations between Russia and Western Europe began. At the same time, the creation of our own fleet was going on. A shipyard is being built in Narva. The first Russian ships were built on it by craftsmen from Kholmogory and Vologda, whom the tsar sent abroad "to supervise how guns are poured and ships are built in the west." A flotilla of 17 ships was based in Narva under the command of the Dane Karsten Rode, who was taken into Russian service.
Capture of Neuhaus (1558). The defense of the Neuhaus fortress, which was defended by several hundred soldiers led by the knight Fon-Padenorm, was distinguished by particular persistence in the campaign of 1558. Despite their small numbers, they staunchly resisted for almost a month, repelling the onslaught of the troops of the voivode Peter Shuisky. After the destruction of the fortress walls and towers by Russian artillery, on June 30, 1558, the Germans withdrew to the upper castle. Von Padenorm wanted to defend himself here to the last extremity, but his surviving associates refused to continue the senseless resistance. As a sign of respect for the courage of the besieged, Shuisky allowed them to leave with honor.
Capture of Dorpat (1558). In July, Shuisky laid siege to Derpt (until 1224 - Yuryev, now the Estonian city of Tartu). The city was defended by a garrison under the command of Bishop Weiland (2 thousand people). And here, first of all, the Russian artillery distinguished itself. On July 11, she began shelling the city. Some towers and loopholes were destroyed by the cannonballs. During the shelling, the Russians brought part of the guns almost to the very fortress wall, opposite the German and St. Andrew's Gates, and opened fire at close range. The shelling of the city lasted 7 days. When the main fortifications were destroyed, the besieged, having lost hope of outside help, entered into negotiations with the Russians. Shuisky promised not to destroy the city and to preserve its former administration for its inhabitants. July 18, 1558 Dorpat capitulated. Order in the city was indeed maintained, and its violators were subjected to severe punishments.
Defense of Ringen (1558). After the capture of a number of cities in Livonia, the Russian troops, leaving garrisons there, left in the autumn for winter quarters within their borders. This was taken advantage of by the new Livonian master Ketler, who gathered a 10,000-strong army and tried to return what was lost. At the end of 1558, he approached the fortress of Ringen, which was defended by a garrison of several hundred archers, led by the governor Rusin-Ignatiev. The Russians bravely held out for five weeks, repulsing two attacks. The detachment of governor Repnin (2 thousand people) tried to help the besieged, but he was defeated by Ketler. This failure did not dampen the spirit of the besieged, who continued to resist. The Germans were able to take the fortress by storm only after its defenders ran out of gunpowder. All the defenders of Ringen were destroyed. Having lost a fifth of his army near Ringen (2 thousand people) and spending more than a month on the siege, Ketler was unable to build on his success. At the end of October, his army retreated to Riga. This small victory turned into a major disaster for the Livonians. In response to their actions, the army of Tsar Ivan the Terrible entered Livonia two months later.
Battle of Tiersen (1559). In the area of this city in Livonia on January 17, 1559, a battle took place between the army of the Livonian Order under the command of the knight Felkenzam and the Russian army, led by the governor Serebryany. The Germans were completely defeated. Felkenzam and 400 knights died in battle, the rest were captured or fled. After this victory, the Russian army freely made a winter raid on the lands of the Order to Riga itself and returned to Russia in February.
Truce (1559). In the spring hostilities did not resume. In May, Russia concluded a truce with the Livonian Order until November 1559. This was largely due to the presence of serious disagreements in the Moscow government over foreign strategy. Thus, the closest advisers to the tsar, headed by the devious Alexei Adashev, were against the war in the Baltic states and advocated the continuation of the struggle in the south, against the Crimean Khanate. This grouping reflected the mood of those circles of the nobility who wished, on the one hand, to eliminate the threat of attacks from the steppes, and on the other, to receive a large additional land fund in the steppe zone.
The armistice of 1559 allowed the Order to gain time and carry out active diplomatic work in order to involve its closest neighbors - Poland and Sweden - in the conflict against Moscow. With his invasion of Livonia, Ivan IV affected the trade interests of the main states that had access to the Baltic region (Lithuania, Poland, Sweden and Denmark). At that time, trade on the Baltic Sea was growing from year to year, and the question of who would control it was very relevant. But not only the problems of their own commercial gain were of interest to Russia's neighbors. They were worried about the strengthening of Russia by getting Livonia. Here is what, for example, the Polish king Sigismund-August wrote to the English Queen Elizabeth about the role of Livonia for the Russians: “The Moscow sovereign daily increases his power by acquiring items that are brought to Narva; for not only goods, but also weapons are brought here, until now unknown to him... the artists (specialists) themselves come, through whom he acquires the means to defeat everyone... Until now, we could defeat him only because he was a stranger to education. But if Narva navigation continues, then what will happen to him unknown?" Thus, the struggle of the Russians for Livonia received a wide international response. The clash in the small Baltic patch of interests of so many states predetermined the severity of the Livonian War, in which military operations were closely intertwined with complex and intricate foreign policy situations.
Defense of Dorpat and Lais (1559).
The master of the Livonian Order, Ketler, actively used the respite given to him. Having received help from Germany and made an alliance with the Polish king, the master broke the truce and went on the offensive in early autumn. He managed to defeat the detachment of governor Pleshcheev near Dorpat with an unexpected attack. In this battle, 1 thousand Russians fell. Nevertheless, the head of the Derpt garrison, governor Katyrev-Rostovsky, managed to take measures to defend the city. When Ketler laid siege to Derpt, the Russians met his army with gunfire and a brave sortie. For 10 days, the Livonians tried to destroy the walls with cannon fire, but to no avail. Not daring for a long winter siege or attack, Ketler was forced to retreat.
On the way back, Ketler decided to capture the fortress of Lais, where there was a small Russian garrison under the command of the head of the archery Koshkarov (400 people). In November 1559, the Livonians set up tours, broke the wall, but could not break into the fortress, stopped by the fierce resistance of the archers. The brave garrison of Lais steadfastly fought off the attacks of the Livonian army for two days. Ketler never managed to overcome the defenders of Lais, and he was forced to retreat to Wenden. The unsuccessful siege of Dorpat and Lais meant the failure of the autumn offensive of the Livonians. On the other hand, their treacherous attack forced Ivan the Terrible to resume hostilities against the Order.
Battles of Wittenstein and Ermes (1560). The decisive battles between Russian and Livonian troops took place in the summer of 1560 near Wittenstein and Ermes. In the first of them, the army of Prince Kurbsky (5 thousand people) defeated the German detachment of the former Master of the Order of Firstenberg. Under Ermes, the cavalry of the governor Barbashin (12 thousand people) completely destroyed a detachment of German knights led by Land Marshal Bel (about 1 thousand people), who tried to suddenly attack the Russian horsemen resting on the edge of the forest. 120 knights and 11 commanders surrendered, including their leader Bel. The victory at Ermes opened the way for the Russians to Fellin.
The Capture of Fellin (1560). In August 1560, a 60,000-strong army led by governors Mstislavsky and Shuisky laid siege to Fellin (known since 1211, now the city of Viljandi in Estonia). This most powerful fortress in the eastern part of Livonia was defended by a garrison under the command of the former Master Firstenberg. The success of the Russians near Fellin was ensured by the effective actions of their artillery, which for three weeks fired continuously at the fortifications. During the siege, the Livonian troops tried to help the besieged garrison from outside, but were defeated. After artillery fire destroyed part of the outer wall and set fire to the city, Fellin's defenders entered into negotiations. But Firstenberg did not want to give up and tried to force them to defend themselves in an impregnable castle inside the fortress. The garrison, not receiving a salary for several months, refused to comply with the order. On August 21, the fellines capitulated.
Having handed over the city to the Russians, its ordinary defenders received a free exit. Important prisoners (including Firstenberg) were sent to Moscow. The released soldiers of the Fellin garrison reached Riga, where they were hanged by Master Ketler for treason. The fall of Fellin actually decided the fate of the Livonian Order. Desperate to defend himself against the Russians on his own, Ketler in 1561 transferred his lands to the Polish-Lithuanian possession. The northern regions with the center in Reval (before 1219 - Kolyvan, now - Tallinn) recognized themselves as subjects of Sweden. According to the Treaty of Vilna (November 1561), the Livonian Order ceased to exist, its territory was transferred to the joint possession of Lithuania and Poland, the last master of the order received the Duchy of Courland. Denmark, which occupied the islands of Khiuma and Saaremaa, also declared its claims to part of the order's lands. As a result, the Russians in Livonia faced a coalition of states that did not want to give up their new possessions. Having not yet managed to capture a significant part of Livonia, including its main ports (Riga and Revel), Ivan IV found himself in an unfavorable situation. But he continued the fight, hoping to separate his opponents.
Second stage (1562-1569)
The most implacable opponent of Ivan IV was the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. She was not satisfied with the capture of Livonia by the Russians, since in this case they received control over the export of grain (through Riga) from the Principality of Lithuania to European countries. Lithuania and Poland feared even more the military strengthening of Russia by receiving strategic goods from Europe through Livonian ports. The intransigence of the parties on the issue of the division of Livonia was also facilitated by their long-standing territorial claims to each other. The Polish-Lithuanian side also tried to seize northern Estonia in order to control all the Baltic trade routes leading to Russia. With such a policy, a clash was inevitable. By claiming Revel, Lithuania spoiled relations with Sweden. This was taken advantage of by Ivan IV, who concluded peace agreements with Sweden and Denmark. Having thus ensured the safety of the port of Narva, the Russian tsar decided to defeat his main competitor, the Principality of Lithuania.
In 1561-1562. hostilities between Lithuanians and Russians took place in Livonia. In 1561, Hetman Radziwill recaptured the Travast fortress from the Russians. But after the defeat near Pernau (Pernava, Pernov, now Pärnu), he was forced to leave it. The next year passed in petty skirmishes and fruitless negotiations. In 1563 Grozny himself took over the task and led the army. The goal of his campaign was Polotsk. The theater of operations moved to the territory of the Lithuanian principality. The conflict with Lithuania significantly expanded the scope and goals of the war for Russia. The long-standing struggle for the return of ancient Russian lands was added to the battle for Livonia.
Capture of Polotsk (1563). In January 1563, the army of Ivan the Terrible (up to 130 thousand people) set out for Polotsk. The choice of the purpose of the campaign was not accidental for a number of reasons. Firstly, Polotsk was a rich trading center, the capture of which promised great booty. Secondly, it was the most important strategic point on the Western Dvina, which had a direct connection with Riga. He also opened the road to Vilna and defended Livonia from the south. The political aspect was no less important. Polotsk was one of the princely centers of Ancient Russia, the lands of which were claimed by the Moscow sovereigns. There were also religious considerations. Large Jewish and Protestant communities settled in Polotsk, which was located near the Russian borders. The spread of their influence within Russia seemed highly undesirable for the Russian clergy.
The siege of Polotsk began on January 31, 1563. The decisive role in its capture was played by the power of Russian artillery. The volleys of two hundred of its guns were so strong that the cannonballs, flying over the fortress wall on one side, hit from the inside on the opposite side. Cannon shots destroyed a fifth of the fortress walls. According to eyewitnesses, there was such a cannon thunder that it seemed as if "the sky and the whole earth fell on the city." Having taken the settlement, the Russian troops laid siege to the castle. After the destruction of part of its walls by artillery fire, the defenders of the fortress surrendered on February 15, 1563. The wealth of the Polotsk treasury and the arsenal were sent to Moscow, and the centers of other faiths were destroyed.
The capture of Polotsk was the biggest political and strategic success of Tsar Ivan the Terrible. "If Ivan IV had died ... at the moment of his greatest successes on the Western Front, his preparations for the final conquest of Livonia, historical memory would have given him the name of the great conqueror, the creator of the world's largest power, like Alexander the Great," wrote historian R. Whipper. However, after Polotsk, a series of military failures followed.
Battle of the Ulla River (1564). After unsuccessful negotiations with the Lithuanians, the Russians launched a new offensive in January 1564. The army of governor Peter Shuisky (20 thousand people) moved from Polotsk to Orsha to join up with the army of Prince Serebryany, which was coming from Vyazma. Shuisky did not take any precautions during the campaign. No reconnaissance was conducted, people walked in discordant crowds without weapons and armor, which were carried on sledges. Nobody thought about the attack of the Lithuanians. Meanwhile, the Lithuanian governors Trotsky and Radziwill received accurate information about the Russian army through scouts. The governors lay in wait for him in a wooded area near the Ulla River (not far from Chashnikov) and unexpectedly attacked on January 26, 1564 with relatively small forces (4 thousand people). Not having time to take battle order and properly arm themselves, Shuisky's soldiers succumbed to panic and began to flee, leaving their entire convoy (5 thousand carts). Shuisky paid for his carelessness with his own life. The famous conqueror of Dorpat died in the beating that began. Upon learning of the defeat of Shuisky's troops, Serebryany retreated from Orsha to Smolensk. Shortly after the defeat at Ulla (in April 1564), a major Russian military leader, a close friend of Ivan the Terrible's youth, Prince Andrei Mikhailovich Kurbsky, fled from Yuryev to the side of Lithuania.
Battle of the Lakes (1564).
The next failure of the Russians was the battle near the town of Ozerishche (now Ezerishche), 60 km north of Vitebsk. Here, on July 22, 1564, the Lithuanian army of voivode Pac (12 thousand people) defeated the army of voivode Tokmakov (13 thousand people).
In the summer of 1564, the Russians set out from Nevel and laid siege to the Lithuanian fortress Ozerishche. An army under the command of Pac moved from Vitebsk to help the besieged. Tokmakov, hoping to easily deal with the Lithuanians, met them with only one of his cavalry. The Russians crushed the advanced Lithuanian squad, but could not withstand the blow of the main army approaching the battlefield and retreated in disorder, losing (according to Lithuanian data) 5 thousand people. After the defeat at Ulla and near Ozerishchi, Moscow's onslaught on Lithuania was suspended for almost a hundred years.
Military failures contributed to the transition of Ivan the Terrible to a policy of repression against part of the feudal nobility, some of whose representatives at that time embarked on the path of conspiracies and outright treason. Peace talks with Lithuania also resumed. She agreed to cede part of the land (including Derpt and Polotsk). But Russia did not get access to the sea, which was the goal of the war. To discuss such an important issue, Ivan IV did not limit himself to the opinion of the boyars, but convened the Zemsky Sobor (1566). He firmly spoke in favor of continuing the campaign. In 1568, the Lithuanian army of Hetman Khodkevich launched an offensive, but its onslaught was stopped by the staunch resistance of the garrison of the Ulla fortress (on the Ulla River).
Unable to cope with Moscow alone, Lithuania concluded the Union of Lublin with Poland (1569). According to it, both countries were united into a single state - the Commonwealth. This was one of the most important and very negative results of the Livonian War for Russia, which had an impact on the future fate of Eastern Europe. With the formal equality of both sides, the leading role in this association belonged to Poland. Having left behind Lithuania, Warsaw is now becoming Moscow's main rival in the west, and the final (4th) stage of the Livonian War can be considered the first Russian-Polish war.
Third stage (1570-1576)
Combining the potentials of Lithuania and Poland sharply reduced Grozny's chances of success in this war. At that time, the situation on the southern borders of the country became seriously aggravated. In 1569, the Turkish army made a campaign against Astrakhan, trying to cut off Russia from the Caspian Sea and open the gates for expansion in the Volga region. Although the campaign ended in failure due to poor preparation, the Crimean-Turkish military activity in the region did not decrease (see Russo-Crimean wars). Relations with Sweden also worsened. In 1568, King Eric XIV was overthrown there, and he developed friendly relations with Ivan the Terrible. The new Swedish government went to the aggravation of relations with Russia. Sweden established a naval blockade of the port of Narva, which made it difficult for Russia to purchase strategic goods. Having completed the war with Denmark in 1570, the Swedes began to strengthen their positions in Livonia.
The deterioration of the foreign policy situation coincided with the growth of tension within Russia. At that time, Ivan IV received news of a conspiracy of the Novgorod leaders, who were going to surrender Novgorod and Pskov to Lithuania. Worried about the news of separatism in a region located near military operations, the tsar in early 1570 set out on a campaign against Novgorod and committed a cruel massacre there. People loyal to the authorities were sent to Pskov and Novgorod. A wide range of people were involved in the inquiry in the "Novgorod case": representatives of the boyars, the clergy, and even prominent guardsmen. In the summer of 1570, executions took place in Moscow.
In the context of the aggravation of the external and internal situation, Ivan IV undertakes a new diplomatic move. He agrees to a truce with the Commonwealth and begins a fight with the Swedes, trying to force them out of Livonia. The ease with which Warsaw agreed to a temporary reconciliation with Moscow was explained by the internal political situation in Poland. The elderly and childless King Sigismund-August lived out his last days there. Expecting his imminent death and the election of a new king, the Poles tried not to aggravate relations with Russia. Moreover, Ivan the Terrible himself was considered in Warsaw one of the likely candidates for the Polish throne.
Having concluded a truce with Lithuania and Poland, the king opposes Sweden. In an effort to enlist the neutrality of Denmark and the support of part of the Livonian nobility, Ivan decides to create a vassal kingdom on the lands of Livonia occupied by Moscow. The brother of the Danish king, Prince Magnus, becomes its ruler. Having created the kingdom of Livonia, dependent on Moscow, Ivan the Terrible and Magnus begin a new stage in the struggle for Livonia. This time the theater of operations is moving to the Swedish part of Estonia.
First siege of Revel (1570-1571).
The main goal of Ivan IV in this area was the largest Baltic port of Revel (Tallinn). On August 23, 1570, Russian-German troops led by Magnus (over 25 thousand people) approached the Reval fortress. The call to surrender was refused by the townspeople who accepted Swedish citizenship. The siege began. The Russians built wooden towers opposite the fortress gates, from which they fired at the city. However, this time he was not successful. The besieged not only defended themselves, but also made bold sorties, destroying the siege structures. The number of besiegers was clearly insufficient to take such a large city with powerful fortifications.
However, the Russian governors (Yakovlev, Lykov, Kropotkin) decided not to lift the siege. They hoped to succeed in the winter, when the sea would be frozen over and the Swedish fleet would be unable to supply reinforcements to the city. Not taking active actions against the fortress, the allied troops were engaged in the devastation of the surrounding villages, restoring the local population against them. Meanwhile, the Swedish fleet managed to deliver a lot of food and weapons to the Revalians before the cold weather, and they endured the siege without much need. On the other hand, murmuring increased among the besiegers, who did not want to endure the difficult conditions of winter standing. After standing at Revel for 30 weeks, the allies were forced to retreat.
Capture of Wittenstein (1572). After that, Ivan the Terrible changes tactics. Leaving Revel alone for the time being, he decides to first completely oust the Swedes from Estonia in order to finally cut off this port from the mainland. At the end of 1572, the tsar himself led the campaign. At the head of an 80,000-strong army, he besieges the stronghold of the Swedes in central Estonia - the Wittenstein fortress (the modern city of Paide). After a powerful shelling, the city was taken by a fierce attack, during which the tsar's favorite, the famous guardsman Malyuta Skuratov, died. According to the Livonian chronicles, the tsar, in a rage, ordered the captured Germans and Swedes to be burned. After the capture of Wittenstein, Ivan IV returned to Novgorod.
Battle of Lod (1573). But hostilities continued, and in the spring of 1573, Russian troops under the command of the voivode Mstislavsky (16 thousand people) converged in an open field, near Lode Castle (Western Estonia), with the Swedish detachment of General Klaus Tott (2 thousand people). Despite a significant numerical superiority (according to the Livonian chronicles), the Russians could not successfully resist the martial art of the Swedish warriors and suffered a crushing defeat. The news of the failure at Lod, which coincided with the uprising in the Kazan region, forced Tsar Ivan the Terrible to temporarily stop hostilities in Livonia and enter into peace negotiations with the Swedes.
Fighting in Estonia (1575-1577). In 1575 a partial truce was concluded with the Swedes. It assumed that until 1577 the theater of military operations between Russia and Sweden would be limited to the Baltic states and not spread to other areas (primarily Karelia). Thus, Grozny was able to concentrate all his efforts on the struggle for Estonia. In the campaign of 1575-1576. Russian troops, with the support of Magnus' supporters, managed to capture the whole of Western Estonia. The central event of this campaign was the capture by the Russians at the end of 1575 of the fortress of Pernov (Pärnu), where they lost 7 thousand people during the assault. (according to Livonian data). After the fall of Pernov, the rest of the fortresses surrendered almost without resistance. Thus, by the end of 1576, the Russians actually took over all of Estonia, with the exception of Revel. The population, weary of the long war, rejoiced at peace. It is interesting that after the voluntary surrender of the powerful Gabsal fortress, the locals staged dances that so impressed the Moscow nobles. According to a number of historians, the Russians were amazed at this and said: “What a strange people the Germans are! If we Russians surrendered such a city without need, we would not dare to raise our eyes on an honest person, and our tsar did not know what kind of execution to execute us And you Germans are celebrating your shame."
Second siege of Revel (1577). Having mastered all of Estonia, the Russians in January 1577 again approached Revel. The troops of the governor Mstislavsky and Sheremetev (50 thousand people) approached here. The city was defended by a garrison led by the Swedish general Gorn. This time, the Swedes prepared even more thoroughly for the defense of their main stronghold. Suffice it to say that the besieged had five times as many guns as the besiegers. For six weeks, the Russians bombarded Revel, hoping to set it on fire with red-hot cannonballs. However, the townspeople took successful measures against fires, creating a special team that monitors the flight and fall of shells. For their part, the Reval artillery responded with even more powerful fire, inflicting severe damage on the besiegers. One of the leaders of the Russian army, voivode Sheremetev, who promised the tsar to take Revel or die, also died from a cannonball. The Russians attacked the fortifications three times, but each time unsuccessfully. In response, the Reval garrison made bold and frequent sorties, preventing serious siege work from being carried out.
The active defense of the Revelians, as well as cold and illness, led to significant losses in the Russian army. On March 13, it was forced to lift the siege. Leaving, the Russians burned their camp, and then conveyed to the besieged that they were not saying goodbye for good, promising to return sooner or later. After the siege was lifted, the Revel garrison and local residents raided the Russian garrisons in Estonia, which, however, was soon stopped by the approach of troops under the command of Ivan the Terrible. However, the king moved no longer to Reval, but to the Polish possessions in Livonia. There were reasons for that.
Fourth stage (1577-1583)
In 1572, the childless Polish king Sigismund-August died in Warsaw. With his death, the Jagiellonian dynasty ended in Poland. The election of a new king dragged on for four years. Anarchy and political anarchy in the Commonwealth temporarily made it easier for the Russians to fight for the Baltic states. During this period, Moscow diplomacy was actively working to bring the Russian tsar to the Polish throne. The candidacy of Ivan the Terrible enjoyed a certain popularity among the petty gentry, who were interested in him as a ruler capable of putting an end to the dominance of the big aristocracy. In addition, the Lithuanian nobility hoped to weaken the Polish influence with the help of Ivan the Terrible. Many in Lithuania and Poland were impressed by rapprochement with Russia for joint defense against the expansion of Crimea and Turkey.
At the same time, Warsaw saw in the choice of Ivan the Terrible a convenient opportunity for the peaceful subjugation of the Russian state and the opening of its borders for Polish noble colonization. So, for example, it has already happened with the lands of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania under the terms of the Union of Lublin. In turn, Ivan IV sought the Polish throne, primarily for the peaceful annexation of Kiev and Livonia to Russia, with which Warsaw categorically disagreed. The difficulties of combining such polar interests ultimately led to the failure of the Russian candidacy. In 1576, the Transylvanian prince Stefan Batory was elected to the Polish throne. This choice destroyed the hopes of Moscow diplomacy for a peaceful solution to the Livonian dispute. In parallel, the government of Ivan IV negotiated with the Austrian emperor Maximilian II, trying to get his support in terminating the Union of Lublin and separating Lithuania from Poland. But Maximilian refused to recognize Russia's rights to the Baltic states, and the negotiations ended in vain.
However, Batory did not meet with unanimous support in the country. Some regions, primarily Danzig, refused to recognize it unconditionally. Taking advantage of the turmoil that broke out on this basis, Ivan IV tried to annex southern Livonia before it was too late. In the summer of 1577, the troops of the Russian tsar and his ally Magnus, violating the truce with the Commonwealth, invaded the southeastern regions of Livonia controlled by Poland. The few Polish units of Hetman Khodkevich did not dare to join the battle and retreated beyond the Western Dvina. Encountering no strong resistance, the troops of Ivan the Terrible and Magnus captured the main fortresses in southeastern Livonia by autumn. Thus, all of Livonia north of the Western Dvina (with the exception of the regions of Riga and Revel) was under the control of the Russian tsar. The campaign of 1577 was the last major military success of Ivan the Terrible in the Livonian War.
The tsar's hopes for a long turmoil in Poland did not come true. Batory turned out to be an energetic and decisive ruler. He laid siege to Danzig and obtained an oath from the locals. Having suppressed the internal opposition, he was able to direct all his forces to the fight against Moscow. Having created a well-armed, professional army of mercenaries (Germans, Hungarians, French), he also concluded an alliance with Turkey and the Crimea. This time, Ivan IV was unable to separate his opponents and found himself alone in the face of strong hostile powers, whose borders stretched from the Don steppes to Karelia. In total, these countries surpassed Russia both in terms of population and military power. True, in the south the situation after the formidable 1571-1572. deflated somewhat. In 1577 Khan Devlet Giray, an implacable enemy of Moscow, died. His son was more peaceful. However, the peacefulness of the new Khan was partly due to the fact that his main patron - Turkey - was at that time busy with a bloody war with Iran.
In 1578, the governors of Bathory invaded southeastern Livonia and managed to recapture almost all of their last year's conquests from the Russians. This time, the Poles acted in concert with the Swedes, who almost simultaneously attacked Narva. With this turn of events, King Magnus betrayed Grozny and went over to the side of the Commonwealth. An attempt by Russian troops to organize a counteroffensive near Wenden ended in failure.
Battle of Wenden (1578).
In October, Russian troops under the command of governor Ivan Golitsyn, Vasily Tyumensky, Khvorostinin and others (18 thousand people) tried to recapture Venden (now the Latvian city of Cesis) taken by the Poles. But arguing about which of them is more important, they lost time. This allowed the Polish troops of Hetman Sapieha to connect with the Swedish detachment of General Boye and arrive in time to help the besieged. Golitsyn decided to retreat, but on October 21, 1578, the Poles and Swedes decisively attacked his army, which barely had time to line up. The Tatar cavalry was the first to waver. Unable to withstand the fire, she fled. After that, the Russian army retreated to their fortified camp and fired from there until dark. At night, Golitsyn fled to Dorpat with his close associates. Following rushed and the remnants of his army.
The honor of the Russian army was saved by artillerymen under the command of the okolnichi Vasily Fedorovich Vorontsov. They did not abandon their guns and remained on the battlefield, determined to fight to the end. The next day, the surviving heroes, who were joined by the detachments of governor Vasily Sitsky, Danilo Saltykov and Mikhail Tyufikin, who decided to support their comrades, entered the battle with the entire Polish-Swedish army. Having shot the ammunition and not wanting to surrender, the Russian gunners hanged themselves on their guns. According to the Livonian chronicles, the Russians lost 6022 people killed near Wenden.
The defeat at Wenden forced Ivan the Terrible to seek peace with Batory. Resuming peace negotiations with the Poles, the tsar decided in the summer of 1579 to strike at the Swedes and finally take Revel. For the march to Novgorod, troops and heavy siege artillery were drawn up. But Batory did not want peace and was preparing to continue the war. Determining the direction of the main attack, the Polish king rejected proposals to go to Livonia, where there were many fortresses and Russian troops (up to 100 thousand people). Fighting in such conditions could cost his army heavy losses. In addition, he believed that in Livonia, devastated by many years of war, he would not find enough food and booty for his mercenaries. He decided to strike where he was not expected and take possession of Polotsk. By this, the king provided a safe rear for his positions in southeastern Livonia and received an important springboard for a campaign against Russia.
Defense of Polotsk (1579).
In early August 1579, Batory's army (30-50 thousand people) appeared under the walls of Polotsk. Simultaneously with his campaign, Swedish troops invaded Karelia. For three weeks, Batory's troops tried to set fire to the fortress with artillery fire. But the defenders of the city, led by the governors Telyatevsky, Volynsky and Shcherbaty, successfully extinguished the fires that arose. This was also favored by the established rainy weather. Then the Polish king, with the promise of high rewards and booty, persuaded his Hungarian mercenaries to storm the fortress. On August 29, 1579, taking advantage of a clear and windy day, the Hungarian infantry rushed to the walls of Polotsk and managed to light them with the help of torches. Then the Hungarians, supported by the Poles, rushed through the flaming walls of the fortress. But its defenders have already managed to dig a moat in this place. When the attackers broke into the fortress, they were stopped at the moat by a volley of cannons. Having suffered heavy losses, Batory's soldiers retreated. But this failure did not stop the mercenaries. Enticed by the legends about the huge wealth stored in the fortress, the Hungarian soldiers, reinforced by the German infantry, again rushed to the attack. But this time the fierce assault was repulsed.
Meanwhile, Ivan the Terrible, interrupting the campaign against Revel, sent part of the search to repel the Swedish onslaught in Karelia. The tsar ordered the detachments under the command of the governor Shein, Lykov and Palitsky to rush to the aid of Polotsk. However, the governors did not dare to engage in battle with the Polish avant-garde sent against them and retreated to the area of \u200b\u200bthe Sokol fortress. Having lost faith in the help of their search, the besieged no longer hoped for the protection of their dilapidated fortifications. Part of the garrison, headed by the voivode Volynsky, entered into negotiations with the king, which ended with the surrender of Polotsk on the condition of a free exit for all military people. Other governors, together with Bishop Cyprian, locked themselves in the church of Hagia Sophia and were captured after stubborn resistance. Some of those who voluntarily surrendered went to the service of Batory. But the majority, despite the fear of reprisals from Ivan the Terrible, chose to return home to Russia (the tsar did not touch them and placed them in border garrisons). The capture of Polotsk brought about a turning point in the Livonian War. From now on, the strategic initiative passed to the Polish troops.
Defense of the Falcon (1579). Having taken Polotsk, Batory on September 19, 1579 laid siege to the Sokol fortress. The number of its defenders by that time had significantly decreased, since the detachments of the Don Cossacks, sent along with Shein to Polotsk, arbitrarily left for the Don. During a series of battles, Batory managed to defeat the manpower of the Moscow army and take the city. On September 25, after a heavy shelling by Polish artillery, the fortress was engulfed in fire. Her defenders, unable to stay in the flaming fortress, made a desperate sortie, but were repulsed and after a fierce fight they ran back to the fortress. A detachment of German mercenaries burst in behind them. But the defenders of the Falcon managed to slam the gate behind him. Lowering the iron bars, they cut off the German detachment from the main forces. Inside the fortress, in fire and smoke, a terrible slaughter began. At this time, the Poles and Lithuanians rushed to the aid of their comrades who were in the fortress. The attackers broke the gate and broke into the burning Falcon. In a ruthless battle, his garrison was almost completely exterminated. Only the voivode Sheremetev was captured with a small detachment. The governors Shein, Palitsky and Lykov died in a battle outside the city. According to the testimony of an old mercenary, Colonel Weyer, in none of the battles did he see such a number of corpses lying in such a limited space. They counted up to 4 thousand. The chronicle testifies to the terrible abuse of the dead. So, the German women cut out fat from dead bodies to make some kind of healing ointment. After the capture of Sokol, Bathory made a devastating raid on the Smolensk and Seversk regions, and then returned back, ending the campaign of 1579.
So, this time Ivan the Terrible had to expect strikes on a broad front. This forced him to stretch his forces, which had thinned over the years of the war, from Karelia to Smolensk. In addition, a large Russian group was in Livonia, where Russian nobles received land and started families. A lot of troops stood on the southern borders, waiting for the attack of the Crimeans. In a word, the Russians could not concentrate all their forces to repel the onslaught of Batory. The Polish king also had another serious advantage. We are talking about the quality of combat training of his soldiers. The main role in the army of Batory was played by professional infantry, which had a wealth of experience in European wars. She was trained in modern methods of combat with firearms, possessed the art of maneuver and interaction of all branches of the armed forces. Of great (sometimes decisive) importance was the fact that the army was personally led by King Bathory - not only a skilled politician, but also a professional commander.
In the Russian army, the main role continued to be played by the horse and foot militia, which had a low degree of organization and discipline. In addition, the dense masses of cavalry, which formed the basis of the Russian army, were highly vulnerable to infantry and artillery fire. There were relatively few regular, well-trained units (archers, gunners) in the Russian army. Therefore, the total significant number did not at all speak of his strength. On the contrary, large masses of insufficiently disciplined and united people could more easily panic and flee from the battlefield. This was evidenced by the unsuccessful, in general, for the Russian field battles of this war (at Ulla, Ozerishchi, Lod, Wenden, etc.). It is no coincidence that the Moscow governors sought to avoid battles in the open field, especially with Batory.
The combination of these unfavorable factors, along with the growth of internal problems (the impoverishment of the peasantry, the agrarian crisis, financial difficulties, the fight against the opposition, etc.), predetermined Russia's failure in the Livonian War. The last weight thrown on the scales of the titanic confrontation was the military talent of King Batory, who turned the tide of the war and snatched the cherished fruit of his many years of efforts from the tenacious hands of the Russian Tsar.
Defense of Velikie Luki (1580).
The following year, Batory continued his attack on Russia in a northeasterly direction. By this, he sought to cut off the communication of the Russians with Livonia. Starting the campaign, the king had hopes for the dissatisfaction of part of society with the repressive policies of Ivan the Terrible. But the Russians did not respond to the king's calls to raise an uprising against their king. At the end of August 1580, Batory's army (50 thousand people) laid siege to Velikie Luki, which covered the path to Novgorod from the south. The city was defended by a garrison headed by the governor Voeikov (6-7 thousand people). 60 km east of Velikiye Luki, in Toropets, there was a large Russian army of governor Khilkov. But he did not dare to go to the aid of Veliky Luki and limited himself to individual sabotage, waiting for reinforcements.
Meanwhile, Bathory launched an attack on the fortress. The besieged responded with bold sorties, during one of which they captured the royal banner. Finally, the besiegers managed to set fire to the fortress with red-hot cannonballs. But even under these conditions, its defenders continued to fight valiantly, turning around to protect themselves from fire with wet skins. On September 5, the fire reached the fortress arsenal, where gunpowder was stored. Their explosion destroyed part of the walls, which made it possible for Batory's soldiers to break into the fortress. The fierce battle continued inside the fortress. In a ruthless massacre, almost all the defenders of Velikiye Luki fell, including the governor Voeikov.
Battle of Toropetsk (1580). Having mastered Velikiye Luki, the king sent a detachment of Prince Zbarazhsky against the voivode Khilkov, who stood inactive at Toropets. On October 1, 1580, the Poles attacked the Russian regiments and won. The defeat of Khilkov deprived the southern regions of the Novgorod lands from protection and allowed the Polish-Lithuanian detachments to continue military operations in this area in the winter. In February 1581 they raided Lake Ilmen. During the raid, the city of Kholm was captured and Staraya Russa was burned. In addition, the fortresses of Nevel, Ozerische and Zavolochye were taken. Thus, the Russians were not only completely ousted from the possessions of the Commonwealth, but also lost significant territories on their western borders. These successes ended the Batory campaign of 1580.
Battle of Nastasino (1580). When Batory took Velikiye Luki, a 9,000-strong Polish-Lithuanian detachment of the local military leader Philon, who had already declared himself governor of Smolensk, set out from Orsha from Orsha. Having passed through the Smolensk regions, he planned to connect with Batory at Velikie Luki. In October 1580, Philon's detachment was met and attacked near the village of Nastasino (7 km from Smolensk) by the Russian regiments of the voivode Buturlin. Under their onslaught, the Polish-Lithuanian army retreated to the wagon train. During the night, Philo abandoned his fortifications and began to withdraw. Acting energetically and persistently, Buturlin organized the persecution. Having overtaken Philon's units 40 versts from Smolensk, on Spassky Lugah, the Russians again decisively attacked the Polish-Lithuanian army and inflicted a complete defeat on it. 10 guns and 370 prisoners were captured. According to the chronicle, Philo himself "barely walked into the forest." This single major Russian victory in the 1580 campaign protected Smolensk from a Polish-Lithuanian attack.
Defense of Padis (1580). Meanwhile, the Swedes resumed the onslaught in Estonia. In October - December 1580, the Swedish army laid siege to Padis (now the Estonian city of Paldiski). The fortress was defended by a small Russian garrison led by the governor Danila Chikharev. Deciding to defend himself to the last extreme, Chikharev ordered the death of a Swedish truce envoy who had come with an offer to surrender. Lacking food supplies, the defenders of Padis suffered a terrible famine. They ate all the dogs, cats, and at the end of the siege they ate straw and skins. Nevertheless, the Russian garrison staunchly held back the onslaught of the Swedish troops for 13 weeks. Only after the third month of the siege did the Swedes manage to storm the fortress, which was defended by half-dead ghosts. After the fall of Padis, its defenders were exterminated. The capture of Padis by the Swedes put an end to the Russian presence in the western part of Estonia.
Pskov defense (1581).
In 1581, having hardly obtained the consent of the Sejm for a new campaign, Batory moved to Pskov. Through this largest city was the main connection between Moscow and the Livonian lands. By taking Pskov, the king planned to finally cut off the Russians from Livonia and end the war victoriously. On August 18, 1581, the army of Bathory (from 50 to 100 thousand people according to various sources) approached Pskov. The fortress was defended by up to 30,000 archers and armed townspeople under the command of governor Vasily and Ivan Shuisky.
The general attack began on 8 September. The attackers managed to break through the fortress wall with gun fire and capture the Svina and Pokrovskaya towers. But the defenders of the city, led by the brave governor Ivan Shuisky, blew up the Pig Tower occupied by the Poles, and then knocked them out from all positions and closed the gap. In the battle near the gap, courageous Pskovite women came to the aid of the men, who brought water and ammunition to their soldiers, and at a critical moment they themselves rushed into hand-to-hand combat. Having lost 5 thousand people, Batory's army retreated. The losses of the besieged amounted to 2.5 thousand people.
Then the king sent a message to the besieged with the words: "Surrender peacefully: you will have honor and mercy, which you do not deserve from the Moscow tyrant, and the people will benefit, unknown in Russia ... In case of insane stubbornness, death to you and the people!". The answer of the Pskovites has been preserved, conveying through the centuries the appearance of the Russians of that era.
"Let your majesty, the proud ruler of Lithuania, King Stephen, know that in Pskov even five years old a Christian child will laugh at your madness... us your holy Christian faith and submit to your mold? And what gain of honor is there in leaving us your sovereign and submitting to an infidel foreigner and becoming like the Jews? .. Or do you think to seduce us with crafty caress or empty flattery or vain wealth? But also the whole world of treasures we do not want for our kiss on the cross, by which we swore allegiance to our sovereign. And why do you, king, scare us with bitter and shameful deaths? If God is for us, then no one is against us! We are all ready to die for our faith and for our sovereign, but we will not surrender the city of Pskov... Get ready for the battle with us, and who will defeat whom, God will show."
A worthy response from the Pskovites finally destroyed Batory's hopes of exploiting Russia's internal difficulties. Having information about the oppositional moods of a part of Russian society, the Polish king did not have real information about the opinion of the overwhelming majority of the people. It did not bode well for the invaders. In the campaigns of 1580-1581. Batory met with stubborn resistance, which he did not count on. Acquainted with the Russians in practice, the king noted that they “did not think about life in defense of cities, cold-bloodedly took the place of the dead ... and blocked the gap with their chests, fighting day and night, eating only bread, dying of hunger, but not surrendering” . The defense of Pskov also revealed the weak side of the mercenary army. Russians died defending their land. Mercenaries fought for money. Having met with a staunch rebuff, they decided to save themselves for other wars. In addition, the maintenance of a mercenary army required huge funds from the Polish treasury, which by that time was already empty.
On November 2, 1581, a new assault took place. He was not distinguished by his former pressure and also failed. During the siege, the Pskovites destroyed tunnels and made 46 bold sorties. Simultaneously with Pskov, the Pskov-Caves Monastery also heroically defended itself, where 200 archers, led by the governor Nechaev, together with the monks, managed to repel the onslaught of a detachment of Hungarian and German mercenaries.
Yam-Zapolsky truce (signed on 15.01.1582 near Zapolsky Yam, south of Pskov). With the onset of cold weather, the mercenary army began to lose discipline and demand an end to the war. The battle for Pskov was the final chord of Batory's campaigns. It is a rare example of a successfully completed defense of the fortress without outside help. Having failed at Pskov, the Polish king was forced to start peace negotiations. Poland did not have the means to continue the war and borrowed money from abroad. After Pskov, Batory could no longer get a loan secured by his success. The Russian tsar also no longer hoped for a favorable outcome of the war and was in a hurry to take advantage of the difficulties of the Poles in order to get out of the fight with the least losses. On January 6 (15), 1582, the Yam-Zapolsky truce was concluded. The Polish king renounced claims to Russian territories, including Novgorod and Smolensk. Russia ceded the Livonian lands and Polotsk to Poland.
Defense of Nut (1582). While Batory was at war with Russia, the Swedes, having reinforced their army with Scottish mercenaries, continued offensive operations. In 1581 they finally ousted the Russian troops from Estonia. The last to fall was Narva, where 7,000 Russians perished. Then the Swedish army under the command of General Pontus Delagaree transferred hostilities to Russian territory, capturing Ivangorod, Yam and Koporye. But the attempt of the Swedes to take Oreshek (now Petrokrepost) in September - October 1582 ended in failure. The fortress was defended by a garrison under the command of the governors of Rostov, Sudakov and Khvostov. Delagardie tried to take Nut on the move, but the defenders of the fortress fought off the attack. Despite the setback, the Swedes did not retreat. On October 8, 1582, in a strong storm, they launched a decisive assault on the fortress. They managed to break the fortress wall in one place and break inside. But they were stopped by a bold counterattack by the garrison units. The autumn flood of the Neva and its strong excitement that day did not allow Delagardie to send reinforcements to the units that broke into the fortress in time. As a result, they were killed by the defenders of Nut and thrown into a stormy river.
Plyussky truce (concluded on the Plyussa River in August 1583). At that time, Russian cavalry regiments under the command of governor Shuisky were already hurrying from Novgorod to help the besieged. Having learned about the movement of fresh forces to Nut, Delagardie lifted the siege of the fortress and left the Russian possessions. In 1583, the Russians concluded the Truce of Plus with Sweden. The Swedes had not only Estonian lands, but also captured Russian cities: Ivangorod, Yam, Koporye, Korela with districts.
Thus ended the 25-year Livonian War. Its completion did not bring peace to the Baltics, which henceforth for a long time became the object of fierce rivalry between Poland and Sweden. This struggle seriously distracted both powers from affairs in the east. As for Russia, its interest in entering the Baltic has not disappeared. Moscow saved up strength and waited in the wings until Peter the Great completed the work begun by Ivan the Terrible.
(before 1569)Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (since 1569)
Kingdom of Sweden
Danish-Norwegian Union
| Ivan groznyj Magnus Livonian |
Gotthard Ketler Sigismund II August † Stefan Batory Eric XIV † Johan III Frederick II |
| date | |
|---|---|
| Place |
territories of modern Estonia, Latvia, Belarus and North-Western Russia |
| Outcome |
victory of the Commonwealth and Sweden |
| Changes |
annexation of parts of Livonia and Velizh to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania; to Sweden - parts of Estonia, Ingria and Karelia |
Battles:
Narva (1558) - Derpt - Ringen - Tiersen - Ermes - Fellin - Nevel - Polotsk (1563) - Chashniki (1564) - Ezerishche - Chashniki (1567) - Revel (1570) - Lode - Pärnu - Revel (1577) - Weisenstein - Wenden - Polotsk (1579) - Sokol - Rzhev - Velikiye Luki - Toropets - Nastasino - Zavolochye - Padis - Shklov - Narva (1581) - Radziwill's raid - Pskov - Lyalitsy - Oreshek Treaties:
Livonian War
The war of Moscow Russia against the Livonian Order, the Polish-Lithuanian state, Sweden and Denmark for hegemony in the Baltic. In addition to Livonia, the Russian Tsar Ivan IV the Terrible hoped to conquer the East Slavic lands that were part of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. In November 1557, he concentrated a 40,000-strong army in Novgorod to march into the Livonian lands. In December, this army, under the command of the Tatar prince Shig-Aley, Prince Glinsky and other governors, moved to Pskov. The auxiliary army of Prince Shestunov at that time began hostilities from the Ivangorod region at the mouth of the Narva (Narova) River. In January 1558, the tsarist army approached Yuryev (Derpt), but could not take it. Then part of the Russian troops turned towards Riga, and the main forces headed for Narva (Rugodiv), where they joined up with Shestunov's army. There was a lull in the fighting. Only the garrisons of Ivangorod and Narva fired at each other. On May 11, Russians from Ivangorod attacked the Narva fortress and captured it the next day.
Soon after the capture of Narva, Russian troops under the command of the voivode Adashev, Zabolotsky and Zamytsky and the duma clerk Voronin were ordered to capture the fortress of Syrensk. On June 2, the regiments were under its walls. Adashev set up barriers on the Riga and Kolyvan roads in order to prevent the main forces of the Livonians under the command of the Master of the Order from reaching Syrensk. On June 5, large reinforcements from Novgorod approached Adashev, which the besieged saw. On the same day, artillery shelling of the fortress began. The next day the garrison surrendered.
From Syrensk, Adashev returned to Pskov, where the entire Russian army was concentrated. In mid-June, it took the fortresses of Neuhausen and Dorpat. The entire north of Livonia was under Russian control. The army of the Order was inferior in number to the Russians by several times and, moreover, was scattered over separate garrisons. It could not oppose anything to the army of the Tsar. Until October 1558, Russian rati in Livonia captured 20 castles.
In January 1559, Russian troops wenttrip to Riga
. Near Tirzen they defeated the Livonian army, and near Riga they burned the Livonian fleet. Although it was not possible to capture the Riga fortress, 11 more Livonian castles were taken. The Master of the Order was forced to conclude a truce before the end of 1559. By November of this year, the Livonians managed to recruit landsknechts in Germany and resume the war. However, failures continued to haunt them. In January 1560, the army of governor Borboshin took the fortresses of Marienburg and Fellin. The Livonian Order as a military force practically ceased to exist. In 1561, the last master of the Livonian Order, Kettler, recognized himself as a vassal of the Polish king and divided Livonia between Poland and Sweden (Esel Island went to Denmark). The Poles got Livonia and Courland (Kettler became the Duke of the latter), the Swedes got Estland.
Poland and Sweden demanded the withdrawal of Russian troops from Livonia.Ivan groznyj
not only did not fulfill this requirement, but also invaded the territory of Lithuania, allied to Poland, at the end of 1562. His army numbered 33407 people. The purpose of the campaign was the well-fortified Polotsk. On February 15, 1563, the city, unable to withstand the fire of 200 Russian guns, capitulated. Ivan's army moved to Vilna. The Lithuanians were forced to conclude a truce until 1564. When the war resumed, Russian troops occupied almost the entire territory of Belarus. However, the repressions that began against the leaders of the "chosen council" - the actual government until the end of the 50s, had a negative impact on the combat capability of the Russian army. Many governors and nobles, fearing reprisals, preferred to flee to Lithuania. In the same 1564, one of the most prominent voivodes, PrinceAndrey Kurbsky
, close to the Adashev brothers, who were members of the elected council, and feared for his life. The subsequent oprichnina terror further weakened the Russian army.
In 1569, as a result of the Union of Lublin, Poland and Lithuania formed a single state, the Commonwealth (Republic), under the leadership of the Polish king. Now Polish troops came to the aid of the Lithuanian army. In 1570, hostilities both in Lithuania and Livonia intensified. To secure the Baltic lands, Ivan the Terrible decided to createown fleet
. At the beginning of 1570, he issued a "letter of commendation" for the organization of a privateer (private) fleet, acting on behalf of the Russian Tsar, to the Dane Carsten Rode. Roda managed to arm several ships, and he caused significant damage to the Polish maritime trade. In order to have a reliable naval base, in the same 1570, Russian troops tried to capture Reval, thereby starting a war with Sweden. However, the city freely received supplies from the sea, and Ivan had to lift the siege after seven months. The Russian privateer fleet never became a formidable force.
After a seven-year lull, in 1577, the 32,000-strong army of Tsar Ivan undertook a newtrip to Revel
. However, this time the siege of the city was not successful. Then the Russian troops went to Riga, capturing Dinaburg, Wolmar and several other castles. However, these successes were not decisive.
Meanwhile, the situation on the Polish front worsened. In 1575, an experienced military leader, the Transylvanian prince Stefan Batory, was elected king of the Commonwealth. He managed to form a strong army, which also included German and Hungarian mercenaries. Batory concluded an alliance with Sweden, and in the fall of 1578 the combined Polish-Swedish army defeated the 18,000-strong Russian army, which lost 6,000 people killed and captured and 17 guns.
By the beginning of the 1579 campaign, Stefan Batory and Ivan the Terrible had main armies of about 40,000 men, approximately equal in number. The Russian tsar, after the defeat at Wenden, was not confident in his abilities and offered to start peace negotiations. However, Batory rejected this proposal and launched an offensive against Polotsk. In autumn, the Polish army laid siege to the city and after a month-long siege captured it. Rati governor Sheina and Sheremeteva, sent to the rescue of Polotsk, only reached the Sokol fortress. They did not dare to engage in battle with superior enemy forces. Soon the Poles also captured Sokol, defeating the troops of Sheremetev and Shein. Ivan the Terrible clearly did not have enough strength to successfully fight on two fronts at once - in Livonia and Lithuania. After the capture of Polotsk, the Poles took several cities in Smolensk and Seversk lands, and then returned to Lithuania.
In 1580, Batory undertook a large campaign against Russia, capturing and ruining the cities of Ostrov, Velizh and Velikiye Luki. At the same time, the Swedish army under the command of Pontus Delagardi captured the city of Korela and the eastern part of the Karelian Isthmus. In 1581, Swedish troops captured Narva, and the following year they occupied Ivangorod, Yam and Koporye. Russian troops were expelled from Livonia. The fighting was transferred to the territory of Russia.
In September 1581, a 50,000-strong Polish army led by the king laid siege to Pskov. It was a very strong fortress. The city, which stood on the right, high bank of the Velikaya River at the confluence of the Pskov River, was surrounded by a stone wall. It stretched for 10 km and had 37 towers and 48 gates. True, from the side of the Velikaya River, from where it was difficult to expect an enemy attack, the wall was wooden. Under the towers there were underground passages that provided covert communication between various defense sectors. The upper tiers of the towers were also connected by passages. The height of the walls was 6.5 m, and the thickness was from 4 to 6 m, which made them invulnerable to the then artillery. Inside the Great Walls there was the Middle City, also surrounded by walls, in the Middle City - the fortified Dovmont city, and in the Dovmont city - the stone Kremlin. Above the level of the Velikaya River, the walls of the city of Dovmont rose 10 m, and the Kremlin - 17 m, which made these fortifications almost impregnable. The city had significant stocks of food, weapons and ammunition.
The Russian army was dispersed over many points, from where an enemy invasion was expected. The tsar himself, with a considerable gradual detachment, stopped in Staritsa, not daring to meet the Polish army marching towards Pskov.
When the tsar learned about the invasion of Stefan Batory, the army of Prince Ivan Shuisky, who was appointed "great commander", was sent to Pskov. Seven other governors were subordinate to him. All the inhabitants of Pskov and the garrison were sworn in that they would not surrender the city, but would fight to the last drop of blood. The total number of Russian troops defending Pskov reached 25 thousand people and was about half the size of Batory's army. By order of Shuisky, the surroundings of Pskov were devastated so that the enemy could not find food and food there.
On August 18, the Polish army approached the city at a distance of 2-3 cannon shots. During the week, Batory conducted reconnaissance of the Russian fortifications and only on August 26 ordered his army to approach the city. However, the soldiers soon came under fire from Russian guns and retreated to the Cherekha River. Here Batory set up a fortified camp.
The Poles began to dig trenches and set up tours to get closer to the walls of the fortress. On the night of September 4-5, they rolled rounds to the Pokrovskaya and Svinaya towers on the southern face of the walls and, placing 20 guns, on the morning of September 6, they began to fire at both towers and 150 m of the wall between them. By the evening of September 7, the towers were badly damaged, and a breach 50 meters wide was formed in the wall. But the besieged managed to build a new wooden wall against the breach.
On September 8, Polish troops launched an assault. The attackers managed to capture both damaged towers. However, shots from a large cannon "Bars", capable of sending cannonballs over a distance of more than one kilometer, the Pig Tower occupied by the Poles was destroyed. Then the Russians blew up its ruins, rolling up barrels of gunpowder. The explosion served as a signal for a counterattack, led by Shuisky himself. The enemy could not hold the Pokrovskaya Tower - and retreated.
After the failure of the assault, Batory ordered digging to blow up the walls. The Russians managed to destroy two tunnels with the help of mine galleries, the rest of the Poles could not be completed. On October 24, Polish batteries began to fire at Pskov from behind the Velikaya River with red-hot cannonballs to start fires, but the city's defenders quickly put out the fire. Four days later, a Polish detachment with crowbars and picks approached the wall from the Velikaya side between the corner tower and the Pokrovsky Gate and destroyed the base of the wall. It collapsed, but it turned out that behind this wall there is another wall and a ditch that the Poles could not overcome. The besieged threw stones and pots of gunpowder on their heads, poured boiling water and pitch.
On November 2, Batory's army launched the last assault on Pskov. This time the Poles attacked the western wall. Prior to that, for five days it was subjected to heavy shelling and was destroyed in several places. However, the defenders of Pskov met the enemy with heavy fire, and the Poles turned back, never reaching the breaches.
By that time, the morale of the besiegers had fallen noticeably. But the besieged also experienced considerable difficulties. The main forces of the Russian army in Staritsa, Novgorod and Rzhev were inactive. Only two detachments of archers of 600 people each tried to break into Pskov, but more than half of them died or were captured.
On November 6, Batory removed the guns from the batteries, stopped siege work and began to prepare for the winter. At the same time, he sent detachments of Germans and Hungarians to capture the Pskov-Caves Monastery, 60 km from Pskov, but the garrison of 300 archers, supported by monks, successfully repelled two attacks, and the enemy was forced to retreat.
Stefan Batory, convinced that he could not take Pskov, in November handed over command to Hetman Zamoysky, and he himself left for Vilna, taking with him almost all the mercenaries. As a result, the number of Polish troops decreased by almost half - to 26 thousand people. The besiegers suffered from cold and disease, the death toll and desertion increased. Under these conditions, Bathory agreed to a ten-year truce. It was concluded in Yama-Zapolsky on January 15, 1582. Russia renounced all its conquests in Livonia, and the Poles liberated the Russian cities they had occupied.
In 1583 it was signedPlus Armistice
with Sweden. Yam, Koporye and Ivangorod passed to the Swedes. For Russia there was only a small section of the Baltic coast at the mouth of the Neva. However, in 1590, after the expiration of the truce, hostilities between the Russians and the Swedes resumed and this time were successful for Moscow. As a result, according to the Tyavzinsky treaty on "eternal peace", Russia regained Yam, Koporye, Ivangorod and Korelsky district. But that was only small consolation. In general, Ivan the Terrible's attempt to gain a foothold in the Baltic failed.
At the same time, sharp contradictions between Poland and Sweden on the issue of control over Livonia facilitated the position of the Russian tsar, excluding a joint Polish-Swedish invasion of Russia. The resources of Poland alone, as the experience of Batory's campaign against Pskov showed, were clearly not enough to capture and hold a significant territory of the Muscovite kingdom. SimultaneouslyLivonian War
showed that Sweden and Poland in the east had a formidable enemy that had to be seriously reckoned with.
The main directions of the foreign policy of the Russian centralized state emerged in the second half of the 15th century, under Grand Duke Ivan III. They boiled down, firstly, to the struggle on the eastern and southern borders with the Tatar khanates that arose on the ruins of the Golden Horde; secondly, to the fight against the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the union of Poland connected with it by the bonds of the union for the Russian, Ukrainian and Belarusian lands captured by the Lithuanian and partly Polish feudal lords; thirdly, to the fight on the northwestern borders against the aggression of the Swedish feudal lords and the Livonian Order, who sought to isolate the Russian state from the natural and convenient outlet it needed to the Baltic Sea.
For centuries, the struggle on the southern and eastern outskirts was a habitual and constant matter. After the collapse of the Golden Horde, the Tatar khans continued to raid the southern borders of Russia. And only in the first half of the 16th century did the long war between the Great Horde and the Crimea absorb the forces of the Tatar world. A protege of Moscow established itself in Kazan. The union between Russia and Crimea lasted for several decades, until the Crimeans destroyed the remnants of the Great Horde. The Ottoman Turks, having subjugated the Crimean Khanate, became a new military force that the Russian state faced in this region. After the attack of the Crimean Khan on Moscow in 1521, the citizens of Kazan broke off vassal relations with Russia. The struggle for Kazan began. Only the third campaign of Ivan IV was successful: Kazan and Astrakhan were taken. Thus, by the mid-50s of the 16th century, a zone of its political influence had developed to the east and south of the Russian state. A force grew in her face that could resist the Crimea and the Ottoman Sultan. The Nogai Horde actually submitted to Moscow, and its influence in the North Caucasus also increased. Following the Nogai Murzas, the Siberian Khan Ediger recognized the power of the king. The Crimean Khan was the most active force holding back Russia's advance to the south and east.
The foreign policy question that has arisen seems natural: should we continue the onslaught on the Tatar world, should we finish the struggle, the roots of which go back to the distant past? Is the attempt to conquer the Crimea timely? Two different programs clashed in Russian foreign policy. The formation of these programs was determined
international circumstances and the alignment of political forces within the country. The elected council considered a decisive fight against Crimea timely and necessary. But she did not take into account the difficulties of implementing this plan. The vast expanses of the "wild field" separated the then Russia from the Crimea. Moscow did not yet have strongholds on this path. The situation spoke more in favor of defense than offensive. In addition to the difficulties of a military nature, there were also great political difficulties. Entering into conflict with the Crimea and Turkey, Russia could count on an alliance with Persia and the German Empire. The latter was under the constant threat of Turkish invasion and lost a significant part of Hungary. But at the moment, the position of Poland and Lithuania, which saw in the Ottoman Empire a serious counterbalance to Russia, was much more important. The joint struggle of Russia, Poland and Lithuania against Turkish aggression was accompanied by serious territorial concessions in favor of the latter. Russia could not abandon one of the main directions in foreign policy: reunification with Ukrainian and Belarusian lands. More realistic was the program of struggle for the Baltic states. Ivan the Terrible disagreed with his council, deciding to go to war against the Livonian Order, to try to advance to the Baltic Sea. In principle, both programs suffered from the same flaw - impracticability at the moment, but at the same time, both were equally urgent and timely. Nevertheless, before the start of hostilities in the western direction, Ivan IV stabilized the situation on the lands of the Kazan and Astrakhan khanates, suppressing the revolt of the Kazan murzas in 1558 and thus forcing the Astrakhan khans to submit.
Even during the existence of the Novgorod Republic, Sweden began to penetrate the region from the west. The first serious skirmish dates back to the 12th century. At the same time, the German knights begin to implement their political doctrine - "March to the East", a crusade against the Slavic and Baltic peoples in order to convert them to Catholicism. In 1201, Riga was founded as a stronghold. In 1202, the Order of the Sword-bearers was founded specifically for operations in the Baltic states, which conquered Yuryev in 1224. Having suffered a series of defeats from the Russian forces and the Baltic tribes, the sword-bearers and the Teutons formed the Livonian Order. The intensified advance of the knights was stopped during 1240-1242. In general, the peace with the order in 1242 did not save from hostilities with the crusaders and the Swedes in the future. The knights, relying on the help of the Roman Catholic Church, at the end of the 13th century captured a significant part of the Baltic lands.
Sweden, having its own interests in the Baltics, was able to intervene in Livonian affairs. The Russian-Swedish war lasted from 1554 to 1557. The attempts of Gustav I Vasa to involve Denmark, Lithuania, Poland and the Livonian Order in the war against Russia did not produce results, although initially it was
the order pushed the Swedish king to fight the Russian state. Sweden lost the war. After the defeat, the Swedish king was forced to pursue an extremely cautious policy towards his eastern neighbor. True, the sons of Gustav Vasa did not share the waiting position of their father. Crown Prince Eric hoped to establish complete Swedish dominance in Northern Europe. It was obvious that after the death of Gustav, Sweden would again take an active part in Livonian affairs. To some extent, the hands of Sweden were tied by the aggravation of Swedish-Danish relations.
The territorial dispute with Lithuania had a long history. Before the death of Prince Gediminas (1316 - 1341), Russian regions accounted for more than two thirds of the entire territory of the Lithuanian state. Over the next hundred years, under Olgerd and Vitovt, the Chernigov-Seversk region (the cities of Chernigov, Novgorod - Seversk, Bryansk), the Kiev region, Podolia (the northern part of the lands between the Bug and the Dniester), Volyn, Smolensk region were conquered.
Under Basil III, Russia claimed the throne of the Principality of Lithuania after the death in 1506 of Alexander, whose widow was the sister of the Russian sovereign. In Lithuania, a struggle began between the Lithuanian-Russian and Lithuanian Catholic groups. After the victory of the latter, Alexander's brother Sigismund ascended the Lithuanian throne. The latter saw Vasily as a personal enemy who claimed the Lithuanian throne. This aggravated the already strained Russo-Lithuanian relations. In such an environment, the Lithuanian Seimas in February 1507 decided to start a war with the eastern neighbor. The Lithuanian ambassadors, in an ultimatum form, raised the question of the return of the lands that had passed to Russia during the last wars with Lithuania. It was not possible to achieve positive results in the process of negotiations, and in March 1507 hostilities began. In 1508, in the Principality of Lithuania itself, an uprising of Prince Mikhail Glinsky, another pretender to the throne of Lithuania, begins. The rebellion received active support in Moscow: Glinsky was accepted into Russian citizenship, in addition, he was given an army under the command of Vasily Shemyachich. Glinsky conducted military operations with varying success. One of the reasons for the failure was the fear of the popular movement of Ukrainians and Belarusians who wanted to reunite with Russia. Not having sufficient funds to successfully continue the war, Sigismund decided to start peace negotiations. On October 8, 1508, "Perpetual Peace" was signed. According to it, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania for the first time officially recognized the transition to Russia of the Seversk cities annexed to the Russian state during the wars of the late 15th - early 16th centuries. But, despite some success, the government of Vasily III did not consider the war of 1508 to be the solution to the issue of Western Russian lands and considered the "eternal peace" as a respite, preparing to continue the struggle. The ruling circles of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania were not inclined to come to terms with the loss of the Seversk lands either.
But under the specific conditions of the middle of the 16th century, a direct clash with Poland and Lithuania was not envisaged. The Russian state could not count on the help of reliable and strong allies. Moreover, the war with Poland and Lithuania would have to be waged in difficult conditions of hostile actions both from the Crimea and Turkey, and from Sweden and even the Livonian Order. Therefore, this variant of foreign policy was not considered by the Russian government at the moment.
One of the important factors that determined the choice of the king in favor of the struggle for the Baltic states was the low military potential of the Livonian Order. The main military force in the country was the knightly Order of the Sword. Over 50 castles scattered throughout the country were in the hands of the order authorities. Half of the city of Riga was subordinated to the supreme authority of the master. The archbishop of Riga (another part of Riga was subordinate to him), and the bishops of Derpt, Revel, Ezel and Courland were completely independent. The knights of the order owned estates on fiefdom. Large cities, such as Riga, Revel, Derpt, Narva, and others, were in fact an independent political force, although they were under the supreme authority of the master or bishops. There were constant clashes between the Order and the spiritual princes. The Reformation spread rapidly in the cities, while chivalry remained largely Catholic. The only organ of the central legislative power was the Landtags, convened by the masters in the city of Wolmar. The meetings were attended by representatives of four estates: the Order, the clergy, chivalry and cities. The resolutions of the Landtags usually had no real significance in the absence of a single executive power. Close ties have existed for a long time between the local Baltic population and the Russian lands. Ruthlessly suppressed economically, politically and culturally, the Estonian and Latvian population was ready to support the military actions of the Russian army in the hope of liberation from national oppression.
The Russian state itself by the end of the 50s. XVI century was a powerful military power in Europe. As a result of the reforms, Russia has become much stronger and has achieved a much higher degree of political centralization than ever before. Permanent infantry units were created - the archery army. The Russian artillery also achieved great success. Russia had not only large enterprises for the manufacture of cannons, cannonballs and gunpowder, but also well-trained numerous personnel. In addition, the introduction of an important technical improvement - the gun carriage - made it possible to use artillery in the field. Russian military engineers have developed a new effective system of engineering support for the attack of fortresses.
Russia in the 16th century became the largest trading power at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, the craft of which was still suffocated by the lack of
non-ferrous and precious metals. The only channel for the receipt of metals was trade with the West through the overhead mediation of Livonian cities. The Livonian cities - Derpt, Riga, Revel and Narva - were part of the Hansa, a trade association of German cities. The main source of their income was intermediary trade with Russia. For this reason, the attempts of the English and Dutch merchants to establish direct trade relations with the Russian state were stubbornly suppressed by Livonia. At the end of the 15th century, Russia tried to influence the trade policy of the Hanseatic League. In 1492, Russian Ivangorod was founded opposite Narva. A little later, the Hanseatic court in Novgorod was closed. The economic growth of Ivangorod could not but frighten the trading elite of the Livonian cities, which were losing huge profits. Livonia, in response, was ready to organize an economic blockade, which was also supported by Sweden, Lithuania and Poland. In order to eliminate the organized economic blockade of Russia, a clause on freedom of communication with European countries through Swedish possessions was included in the 1557 peace treaty with Sweden. Another channel of Russian-European trade passed through the cities of the Gulf of Finland, in particular, Vyborg. The further growth of this trade was hindered by the contradictions between Sweden and Russia in border issues.
Trade on the White Sea, although of great importance, could not solve the problems of Russian-Northern European contacts for many reasons: navigation on the White Sea is impossible for most of the year; the way there was difficult and distant; contacts were unilateral in nature with the complete monopoly of the British, etc. The development of the Russian economy, which needed constant and unhindered trade relations with the countries of Europe, set the task of gaining access to the Baltic.
The roots of the war for Livonia should be sought not only in the described economic situation of the Muscovite state, they also lay in the distant past. Even under the first princes, Russia was in close contact with many foreign states. Russian merchants traded in the markets of Constantinople, marriage unions connected the princely family with European dynasties. In addition to overseas merchants, ambassadors of other states and missionaries often came to Kiev. One of the consequences of the Tatar-Mongol yoke for Russia was the forcible reorientation of foreign policy towards the East. The war for Livonia was the first serious attempt to bring Russian life back on track, to restore the interrupted connection with the West.
International life posed the same dilemma for every European state: to secure for itself an independent position in the sphere of international relations, or to serve as a mere object of interests of other powers. In many respects from the outcome of the struggle for the Baltic states
the future of the Muscovite state depended: whether it would enter the family of European peoples, having the opportunity to communicate independently with the states of Western Europe.
In addition to trade and international prestige, the territorial claims of the Russian Tsar played an important role among the causes of the war. In the first message of Ivan the Terrible, Ivan IV reasonably states: "... The city of Vladimir, located in our patrimony, the Livonian land ...". Many Baltic lands have long belonged to the Novgorod land, as well as the banks of the Neva River and the Gulf of Finland, subsequently captured by the Livonian Order.
The social factor should not be discounted either. The program of the struggle for the Baltic states met the interests of the nobility and the townspeople. The nobility counted on land distribution in the Baltics, as opposed to the boyar nobility, which was more satisfied with the option of annexing the southern lands. Due to the remoteness of the "wild field", the impossibility of establishing a strong central authority there, at least at first, the landowners - the boyars had the opportunity to occupy the position of almost independent sovereigns in the southern regions. Ivan the Terrible sought to weaken the influence of the titled Russian boyars, and, naturally, he took into account, first of all, the interests of the nobility and merchant classes.
With the complex alignment of forces in Europe, it was extremely important to choose a favorable moment for the start of hostilities against Livonia. It came to Russia at the end of 1557 - the beginning of 1558. The defeat of Sweden in the Russian-Swedish war temporarily neutralized this rather strong enemy, which had the status of a maritime power. Denmark at this point was distracted by the aggravation of its relations with Sweden. Lithuania and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania were not bound by serious complications of the international order, but were not ready for a military clash with Russia due to unresolved issues of the internal order: social conflicts within each state and disagreements over the union. Proof of this is the fact that in 1556 the expired truce between Lithuania and the Russian state was extended for six years. And finally, as a result of military operations against the Crimean Tatars, it was possible for some time not to be afraid of the southern borders. The raids resumed only in 1564 during a period of complications on the Lithuanian front.
During this period, relations with Livonia were rather strained. In 1554, Alexey Adashev and the clerk Viskovaty announced to the Livonian embassy that they did not want to extend the truce due to:
Non-payment by the Bishop of Dorpat of tribute from the possessions ceded to him by the Russian princes;
The oppression of Russian merchants in Livonia and the ruin of Russian settlements in the Baltic.
The establishment of peaceful relations between Russia and Sweden contributed to the temporary settlement of Russian-Livonian relations. After Russia lifted the ban on the export of wax and lard, Livonia was presented with the terms of a new truce:
Unimpeded transportation of weapons to Russia;
Guaranteed payment of tribute by the Bishop of Derpt;
Restoration of all Russian churches in Livonian cities;
Refusal to enter into an alliance with Sweden, the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania;
Providing conditions for free trade.
Livonia was not going to fulfill its obligations under a truce concluded for fifteen years.
Thus, the choice was made in favor of resolving the Baltic issue. This was facilitated by a number of reasons: economic, territorial, social and ideological. Russia, being in a favorable international situation, had a high military potential and was ready for a military conflict with Livonia for the possession of the Baltic states.
After the conquest of Kazan, Russia turned its eyes to the Baltic and put forward plans for the capture of Livonia. For Russia, the main goal of the Livonian War was the conquest of access to the Baltic Sea. The struggle for supremacy at sea was between Lithuania and Poland, Sweden, Denmark and Russia.
The reason for the start of the war was the non-payment of tribute by the Livonian Order, which they undertook to pay under the peace treaty of 1554. In 1558, Russian troops invaded Livonia.
At the first stage of the war (1558-1561), several cities and castles were taken, including such significant ones as Narva, Derpt, Yuryev.
Instead of continuing the successfully launched offensive, the Moscow government granted the Order a truce and at the same time equipped an expedition against the Crimea. Taking advantage of the respite, the Livonian knights gathered military forces and, a month before the end of the truce, defeated the Russian troops.
Russia did not achieve results in the war against the Crimean Khanate and missed favorable opportunities for victory in Livonia. Moscow made peace with the Crimea and concentrated all its forces in Livonia.
The second stage of the war (1562-1578) for Russia passed with varying success.
The highest achievement of Russia in the Livonian War was the capture of Polotsk in February 1563, after which military failures followed.
In 1566, Lithuanian ambassadors arrived in Moscow with a proposal for a truce and so that Polotsk and part of Livonia remained behind Moscow. Ivan the Terrible demanded all of Livonia. Such demands were rejected, and the Lithuanian king Sigismund August resumed the war with Russia. In 1568, Sweden terminated the previously concluded alliance with Russia. In 1569, Poland and Lithuania united into a single state - the Commonwealth. After the death of Sigismund Augustus in 1572, Stefan Batory took the throne.
The third stage of the Livonian War (1679-1583) began with the invasion of Russia by the Polish king Stefan Batory. At the same time, Russia had to fight with Sweden. On September 9, 1581, Sweden captured Narva, and after that, the continuation of the struggle for Livonia lost its meaning for Grozny. Realizing the impossibility of waging war with two opponents at once, the tsar began negotiations with Bathory on a truce in order to concentrate all forces on the recapture of Narva. But the plans for an attack on Narva remained unfulfilled.
The result of the Livonian War was the conclusion of two treaties that were unfavorable for Russia.
On January 15, 1582, Yam Zapolsky signed an agreement on a 10-year truce. Russia ceded all its possessions in Livonia to Poland, and Batory returned to Russia the fortresses and cities he had conquered, but retained Polotsk.
In August 1583, Russia and Sweden signed the Plyussky truce for three years. The Swedes retained all the captured Russian cities. Russia retained a section of the coast of the Gulf of Finland with the mouth of the Neva.
The end of the Livonian War did not give Russia access to the Baltic Sea.