Hundreds of books have been published about the tragedy of the family of Tsar Nicholas II in many languages of the world. These studies quite objectively present the events of July 1918 in Russia. Some of these writings I had to read, analyze and compare. However, there are many mysteries, inaccuracies, and even deliberate untruths.
Among the most reliable information are the protocols of interrogations and other documents of the Kolchak court investigator for especially important cases N.A. Sokolov. In July 1918, after the capture of Yekaterinburg by the White troops, the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of Siberia, Admiral A.V. Kolchak appointed N.A. Sokolov as the leader in the case of the execution of the royal family in this city.
ON THE. Sokolov
Sokolov worked for two years in Yekaterinburg, interrogated a large number of people involved in these events, tried to find the remains of the executed members of the royal family. After the capture of Yekaterinburg by the Red troops, Sokolov left Russia and in 1925 published the book "The Murder of the Imperial Family" in Berlin. He took all four copies of his materials with him.
The Central Party Archives of the Central Committee of the CPSU, where I worked as a leader, kept mostly original (first) copies of these materials (about a thousand pages). How they got into our archive is unknown. I have read all of them carefully.
For the first time, a detailed study of materials related to the circumstances of the execution of the royal family was carried out on the instructions of the Central Committee of the CPSU in 1964.
In a detailed reference “on some circumstances related to the execution of the Romanov royal family” dated December 16, 1964 (CPA of the Institute of Marxism-Leninism under the Central Committee of the CPSU, fund 588 inventory 3C), all these problems are documented and objectively considered.
The certificate was written then by the head of the sector of the ideological department of the Central Committee of the CPSU, Alexander Nikolaevich Yakovlev, an outstanding political figure in Russia. Not being able to publish the entire reference mentioned above, I cite only some passages from it.
“In the archives, no official reports or resolutions have been found that precede the execution of the Romanov royal family. There is no indisputable data about the participants in the execution. In this regard, the materials published in the Soviet and foreign press, and some documents of the Soviet party and state archives were studied and compared. In addition, the stories of the former assistant commandant of the Special Purpose House in Yekaterinburg, where the royal family was kept, G.P. Nikulin and a former member of the collegium of the Ural Regional Cheka I.I. Radzinsky. These are the only surviving comrades who had something to do with the execution of the Romanov royal family. Based on the available documents and memoirs, often contradictory, one can draw up such a picture of the execution itself and the circumstances associated with this event. As you know, Nicholas II and members of his family were shot on the night of July 16-17, 1918 in Yekaterinburg. Documentary sources testify that Nicholas II and his family were executed by decision of the Ural Regional Council. In the protocol No. 1 of the meeting of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee of July 18, 1918, we read: “We heard: The message about the execution of Nikolai Romanov (telegram from Yekaterinburg). Decided: After discussion, the following resolution is adopted: The Presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee recognizes the decision of the Ural Regional Council as correct. Instruct tt. Sverdlov, Sosnovsky and Avanesov to draw up an appropriate notice for the press. Publish about the documents available in the All-Russian Central Executive Committee - (diary, letters, etc.) of the former Tsar N. Romanov and instruct Comrade Sverdlov to form a special commission to analyze these papers and publish them. The original, stored in the Central State Archives, signed by Ya.M. Sverdlov. As V.P. Milyutin (People's Commissar for Agriculture of the RSFSR), on the same day, July 18, 1918, a regular meeting of the Council of People's Commissars was held in the Kremlin late in the evening ( Council of People's Commissars.— Ed. ) chaired by V.I. Lenin. “During the report of Comrade Semashko, Ya.M. entered the meeting room. Sverdlov. He sat down on a chair behind Vladimir Ilyich. Semashko finished his report. Sverdlov went up, leaned over to Ilyich and said something. “Comrades, Sverdlov is asking for the floor for a message,” Lenin announced. “I must say,” Sverdlov began in his usual even tone, “a message has been received that in Yekaterinburg, by order of the regional Soviet, Nikolai was shot. Nicholas wanted to run. The Czechoslovaks advanced. The Presidium of the Central Executive Committee decided: to approve. Silence of all. "Now let's move on to reading the project article by article," suggested Vladimir Ilyich. (Magazine "Projector", 1924, p. 10). This is a message from Ya.M. Sverdlov was recorded in the protocol No. 159 of the meeting of the Council of People's Commissars dated July 18, 1918: “We heard: An extraordinary statement by the Chairman of the Central Executive Committee, Comrade Sverdlov, on the execution of the former Tsar, Nicholas II, by the verdict of the Yekaterinburg Soviet of Deputies and on the approval of this verdict by the Presidium of the Central Executive Committee. Resolved: Take note. The original of this protocol, signed by V.I. Lenin, is stored in the party archive of the Institute of Marxism-Leninism. A few months before that, at a meeting of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee, the issue of transferring the Romanov family from Tobolsk to Yekaterinburg was discussed. Ya.M. Sverdlov speaks about this on May 9, 1918: “I must tell you that the question of the position of the former tsar was raised by us in the Presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee back in November, at the beginning of December (1917) and has been repeatedly raised since then, but we have not accepted no decision, taking into account the fact that it is necessary to first accurately familiarize yourself with how, under what conditions, how reliable protection is, how, in a word, the former Tsar Nikolai Romanov is kept. At the same meeting, Sverdlov reported to the members of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee that at the very beginning of April, the Presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee heard the report of the representative of the committee of the team guarding the tsar. “Based on this report, we came to the conclusion that it was impossible to leave Nikolai Romanov in Tobolsk ... The Presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee decided to transfer the former Tsar Nikolai to a more reliable point. The center of the Urals, the city of Yekaterinburg, was chosen as such a more reliable point. The fact that the issue of transferring the family of Nicholas II was resolved with the participation of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee is also said in their memoirs by the old communists from the Urals. Radzinsky said that the initiative for the transfer belonged to the Ural Regional Council, and "the Center did not object" (Tape recording of May 15, 1964). P.N. Bykov, a former member of the Ural Council, in his book The Last Days of the Romanovs, published in 1926 in Sverdlovsk, writes that in early March 1918, the regional military commissar I. Goloshchekin (party nickname "Philip"). He was given permission to transfer the royal family from Tobolsk to Yekaterinburg.
Further, in the certificate “On some circumstances connected with the execution of the Romanov royal family,” the terrible details of the cruel execution of the royal family are given. It talks about how the corpses were destroyed. It is said that about half a pood of diamonds and jewelry were found in the sewn corsets and belts of the dead. In this article I would not like to discuss such inhuman acts.
For many years, the world press has been circulating the assertion that “the true course of events and the refutation of the “falsifications of Soviet historians” are contained in Trotsky’s diary entries, which were not intended for publication, therefore, they say, especially frank. They were prepared for publication and published by Yu.G. Felshtinsky in the collection: “Leo Trotsky. Diaries and Letters (Hermitage, USA, 1986).
I am quoting an excerpt from this book.
“April 9 (1935) The White Press once very heatedly debated the question of whose decision the royal family was put to death. The liberals were inclined, as it were, to the fact that the Urals executive committee, cut off from Moscow, acted independently. This is not true. The decision was made in Moscow. It happened during the critical period of the civil war, when I spent almost all my time at the front, and my recollections of the royal family's affair are fragmentary.
In other documents, Trotsky recounts a meeting of the Politburo a few weeks before the fall of Yekaterinburg, at which he argued for the need for an open trial "which was supposed to unfold the picture of the entire reign."
“Lenin responded in the sense that it would be very good if it were feasible. But there may not be enough time. There was no debate, because (as) I did not insist on my proposal, absorbed in other things.
In the next episode from the diaries, the most frequently quoted, Trotsky recalls how, after the execution, to his question about who decided the fate of the Romanovs, Sverdlov replied: “We decided here. Ilyich believed that it was impossible to leave us a living banner for them, especially in the current difficult conditions.
Nicholas II with his daughters Olga, Anastasia and Tatyana (Tobolsk, winter 1917). Photo: Wikipedia“They decided” and “Ilyich considered” can, and according to other sources, should be interpreted as the adoption of a general decision in principle that the Romanovs should not be left as a “living banner of the counter-revolution”.
And is it so important that the immediate decision to execute the Romanov family was issued by the Ural Council?
Here is another interesting document. This is a telegraphic request dated July 16, 1918 from Copenhagen, in which it was written: “To Lenin, a member of the government. From Copenhagen. A rumor spread here that the former tsar had been murdered. Please tell me the facts by phone." On the telegram, Lenin wrote in his own hand: “Copenhagen. The rumor is false, the former tsar is healthy, all rumors are lies of the capitalist press. Lenin.
We were not able to find out whether a reply telegram was then sent. But it was the very eve of that tragic day when the tsar and his relatives were shot.
Ivan Kitaev- especially for "New"
reference
Ivan Kitaev is a historian, candidate of historical sciences, vice-president of the International Academy of Corporate Governance. He went from a carpenter on the construction of the Semipalatinsk test site and the Abakan-Taishet road, from a military builder who built a uranium enrichment plant in the taiga wilderness, to an academician. He graduated from two institutes, the Academy of Social Sciences, postgraduate studies. He worked as a secretary of the Togliatti city committee, the Kuibyshev regional committee, director of the Central Party Archive, deputy director of the Institute of Marxism-Leninism. After 1991, he worked as the head of the head office and head of the department of the Ministry of Industry of Russia, taught at the academy.
Lenin is characterized by the highest measure
About the organizers and customer of the murder of the family of Nikolai Romanov
In his diaries, Trotsky does not limit himself to quoting the words of Sverdlov and Lenin, but also expresses his own opinion about the execution of the royal family:
"Essentially, the decision ( about execution. — OH.) was not only expedient, but also necessary. The severity of the reprisals showed everyone that we would fight mercilessly, stopping at nothing. The execution of the royal family was needed not only to intimidate, horrify, and deprive the enemy of hope, but also to shake up their own ranks, to show that there was no retreat, that complete victory or complete death lay ahead. There were probably doubts and shaking of heads in the intellectual circles of the party. But the masses of workers and soldiers did not doubt for a moment: they would not have understood or accepted any other decision. Lenin felt this very well: the ability to think and feel for the masses and with the masses was highly characteristic of him, especially at great political turns ... "
As for the extreme measure characteristic of Ilyich, Lev Davidovich, of course, is archipraved. So Lenin, as you know, personally demanded that as many priests as possible be hanged, as soon as he received a signal that the masses in some places in the localities had shown such an initiative. How can the people's power not support the initiative from below (and in reality the basest instincts of the crowd)!
As for the trial of the tsar, to which, according to Trotsky, Ilyich agreed, but time was running out, this trial would obviously have ended with the sentence of Nicholas to the highest measure. But in this case, unnecessary difficulties could arise with the royal family. And then how nice it turned out: the Ural Council decided - and that's it, bribes are smooth, all power to the Soviets! Well, maybe only "in the intellectual circles of the party" there was some shock, but quickly passed, like with Trotsky himself. In his diaries, he cites a fragment of a conversation with Sverdlov after the Yekaterinburg execution:
“Yes, but where is the king? - It's over, - he answered, - shot. - Where is the family? And his family is with him. - Everything? I asked, apparently with a hint of surprise. - Everything! Sverdlov replied. - And what? He was waiting for my reaction. I didn't answer. - And who decided? “We decided here…”
Some historians emphasize that Sverdlov did not answer “decided”, but “decided”, which is supposedly important for identifying the main culprits. But at the same time they take Sverdlov's words out of the context of the conversation with Trotsky. And here, after all, how: what is the question, such is the answer: Trotsky asks who decided, and here Sverdlov answers, “We decided here.” And further on he speaks even more specifically - about what Ilyich considered: "we must not leave us a living banner for them."
So, in his resolution on the Danish telegram of July 16, Lenin was clearly disingenuous, speaking about the lies of the capitalist press regarding the "health" of the tsar.
In modern terms, we can say this: if the Ural Soviet was the organizer of the murder of the royal family, then Lenin was the customer. But in Russia, the organizers are rare, and the customers of the crimes almost never, alas, do not find themselves in the dock.
The commandant of the House of Special Purpose, Yakov Yurovsky, was entrusted with the execution of the members of the family of the former emperor. It was from his manuscripts that they later managed to restore the terrible picture that unfolded that night in the Ipatiev House.
According to the documents, the execution order was delivered to the place of execution at half past one in the night. Forty minutes later, the entire Romanov family and their servants were brought to the basement. “The room was very small. Nikolai stood with his back to me, - he recalled. —
I announced that the Executive Committee of the Soviets of Workers', Peasants' and Soldiers' Deputies of the Urals had decided to shoot them. Nicholas turned and asked. I repeated the order and commanded: "Shoot." I shot first and killed Nikolai on the spot.
The emperor was killed the first time - unlike his daughters. The commander of the execution of the royal family later wrote that the girls were literally “booked in bras made of a solid mass of large diamonds,” so the bullets bounced off them without causing harm. Even with the help of a bayonet, it was not possible to break through the “precious” bodice of the girls.
Photo report: 100 years since the execution of the royal family
Is_photorep_included11854291: 1
“For a long time I could not stop this shooting, which had taken on a careless character. But when I finally managed to stop, I saw that many were still alive. ... I was forced to shoot everyone in turn, ”wrote Yurovsky.
That night, even the royal dogs could not survive - together with the Romanovs, two of the three pets belonging to the emperor's children were killed in the Ipatiev House. The corpse of Grand Duchess Anastasia's spaniel, preserved in the cold, was found a year later at the bottom of a mine in Ganina Yama - the dog's paw was broken and its head was pierced.
The French bulldog Ortino, who belonged to Grand Duchess Tatiana, was also brutally killed - presumably hanged.
Miraculously, only Tsarevich Alexei's spaniel named Joy was saved, who was then sent to recover from what he experienced in England to Nicholas II's cousin, King George.
The place "where the people put an end to the monarchy"
After the execution, all the bodies were loaded into one truck and sent to the abandoned mines of Ganina Yama in the Sverdlovsk region. There, at first, they tried to burn them, but the fire would have been huge for everyone, so it was decided to simply dump the bodies into the shaft of the mine and throw them with branches.
However, it was not possible to hide what had happened - the very next day, rumors spread around the region about what had happened at night. As one of the members of the firing squad, forced to return to the site of the failed burial, later admitted, the icy water washed away all the blood and froze the bodies of the dead so that they looked like they were alive.
The Bolsheviks tried to approach the organization of the second burial attempt with great attention: the area was first cordoned off, the bodies were again loaded onto a truck, which was supposed to transport them to a more secure place. However, even here they were in for a failure: after a few meters of the way, the truck was firmly stuck in the swamps of the Porosenkov Log.
Plans had to be changed on the fly. Some of the bodies were buried right under the road, the rest were filled with sulfuric acid and buried a little further away, covered with sleepers from above. These cover-up measures proved to be more effective. After Yekaterinburg was occupied by Kolchak's army, he immediately gave the order to find the bodies of the dead.
However, the forensic investigator Nikolai y, who arrived at Porosenkov log, managed to find only fragments of burnt clothes and a cut off female finger. “This is all that remains of the August Family,” Sokolov wrote in his report.
There is a version that the poet Vladimir Mayakovsky was one of the first to learn about the place where, in his words, "the people put an end to the monarchy." It is known that in 1928 he visited Sverdlovsk, having previously met with Pyotr Voikov, one of the organizers of the execution of the royal family, who could tell him secret information.
After this trip, Mayakovsky wrote the poem "Emperor", in which there are lines with a fairly accurate description of the "Romanov grave": "Here the cedar was touched with an ax, notches under the root of the bark, at the root under the cedar there is a road, and the emperor is buried in it."
Confession of execution
At first, the new Russian government tried with all its might to assure the West of its humanity in relation to the royal family: they are all alive and in a secret place in order to prevent the implementation of the White Guard conspiracy. Many high-ranking politicians of the young state tried to avoid answering or answered very vaguely.
So, the People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs at the Genoa Conference of 1922 told reporters: “The fate of the daughters of the king is not known to me. I read in the papers that they were in America."
Pyotr Voikov, answering this question in a more informal setting, cut off all further inquiries with the phrase: "The world will never know what we did to the royal family."
Only after the publication of the investigation materials of Nikolai Sokolov, which gave a vague idea of the massacre of the imperial family, did the Bolsheviks have to admit at least the very fact of the execution. However, the details and information about the burial still remained a mystery, shrouded in darkness in the basement of the Ipatiev House.
Occult version
It is not surprising that a lot of falsifications and myths appeared regarding the execution of the Romanovs. The most popular of these was a rumor about a ritual murder and about the severed head of Nicholas II, which was allegedly taken away for storage by the NKVD. This, in particular, is evidenced by the testimony of General Maurice Janin, who oversaw the investigation of the execution from the Entente.
Supporters of the ritual nature of the murder of the imperial family have several arguments. First of all, attention is drawn to the symbolic name of the house in which everything happened: in March 1613, who laid the foundation for the dynasty, ascended the kingdom in the Ipatiev Monastery near Kostroma. And after 305 years, in 1918, the last Russian Tsar Nikolai Romanov was shot in the Ipatiev House in the Urals, requisitioned by the Bolsheviks specifically for this.
Later, engineer Ipatiev explained that he bought the house six months before the events unfolding in it. There is an opinion that this purchase was made on purpose to give symbolism to the grim murder, since Ipatiev communicated quite closely with one of the organizers of the execution, Pyotr Voikov.
Lieutenant General Mikhail Diterikhs, who investigated the murder of the royal family on behalf of Kolchak, concluded in his conclusion: “It was a systematic, premeditated and prepared extermination of the members of the Romanov House and those who were exceptionally close to them in spirit and beliefs.
The direct line of the Romanov Dynasty ended: it began in the Ipatiev Monastery in the Kostroma province and ended in the Ipatiev House in the city of Yekaterinburg.
Conspiracy theorists also drew attention to the connection between the murder of Nicholas II and the Chaldean ruler of Babylon, King Belshazzar. So, some time after the execution in the Ipatiev House, lines from Heine's ballad dedicated to Belshazzar were discovered: "Belzatsar was killed that night by his servants." Now a piece of wallpaper with this inscription is stored in the State Archives of the Russian Federation.
According to the Bible, Belshazzar, like him, was the last king of his kind. During one of the celebrations in his castle, mysterious words appeared on the wall, predicting his imminent death. That same night, the biblical king was killed.
Prosecutorial and ecclesiastical investigation
The remains of the royal family were officially found only in 1991 - then nine bodies were discovered buried in the Piglet Meadow. Nine years later, the missing two bodies were discovered - severely burned and mutilated remains, presumably belonging to Tsarevich Alexei and Grand Duchess Maria.
Together with specialized centers in the UK and the USA, she conducted many examinations, including molecular genetics. With its help, DNA isolated from the found remains was deciphered and compared, and samples of the brother of Nicholas II Georgy Alexandrovich, as well as his nephew, the son of Olga's sister Tikhon Nikolaevich Kulikovsky-Romanov.
The examination also compared the results with the blood on the king's shirt, stored in. All researchers agreed that the found remains really belong to the Romanov family, as well as their servants.
However, the Russian Orthodox Church still refuses to recognize the remains found near Yekaterinburg as authentic. According to officials, this was due to the fact that the church was not initially involved in the investigation. In this regard, the patriarch did not even come to the official burial of the remains of the royal family, which took place in 1998 in the Peter and Paul Cathedral in St. Petersburg.
After 2015, the study of the remains (which had to be exhumed for this) continues with the participation of a commission formed by the patriarchate. According to the latest conclusions of experts, published on July 16, 2018, complex molecular genetic examinations “confirmed that the discovered remains belong to the former Emperor Nicholas II, members of his family and people from their entourage.”
The lawyer of the imperial house, German Lukyanov, said that the church commission would take into account the results of the examination, but the final decision would be announced at the Bishops' Council.
The canonization of the martyrs
Despite the unceasing disputes over the remains, back in 1981 the Romanovs were canonized as martyrs of the Russian Orthodox Church abroad. In Russia, this happened only eight years later, since from 1918 to 1989 the tradition of canonization was interrupted. In 2000, the murdered members of the royal family were given a special church rank - passion-bearers.
As the scientific secretary of the St. Philaret Orthodox Christian Institute, church historian Yulia Balakshina told Gazeta.Ru, the martyrs are a special rite of holiness, which some call the discovery of the Russian Orthodox Church.
“The first Russian saints were also canonized precisely as passion-bearers, that is, people who humbly, imitating Christ, accepted their death. Boris and Gleb - from the hands of their brother, and Nicholas II and his family - from the hands of the revolutionaries, ”Balakshina explained.
According to the church historian, it was very difficult to rank the Romanovs among the saints in fact of life - the family of rulers was not distinguished by pious and virtuous deeds.
It took six years to complete all the documents. “In fact, there are no terms for canonization in the Russian Orthodox Church. Nevertheless, disputes about the timeliness and necessity of the canonization of Nicholas II and his family are ongoing to this day. The main argument of the opponents is that by transferring the innocently murdered Romanovs to the level of celestials, the Russian Orthodox Church deprived them of elementary human compassion, ”said the church historian.
There were also attempts to canonize the rulers in the West, Balakshina added: “At one time, the brother and direct heir of the Scottish Queen Mary Stuart turned to such a request, citing the fact that at the hour of her death she demonstrated great generosity and commitment to faith. But she is still not ready to positively resolve this issue, referring to the facts from the life of the ruler, according to which she was involved in the murder and accused of adultery.
According to official history, on the night of July 16-17, 1918, Nikolai Romanov, along with his wife and children, was shot. After the burial was opened and identified, the remains were reburied in 1998 in the tomb of the Peter and Paul Cathedral in St. Petersburg. However, then the ROC did not confirm their authenticity.
“I cannot rule out that the church will recognize the royal remains as genuine if convincing evidence of their authenticity is found and if the examination is open and honest,” said Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk, head of the Department for External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate, in July this year.
As you know, the Russian Orthodox Church did not participate in the burial of the remains of the royal family in 1998, explaining this by the fact that the church is not sure whether the true remains of the royal family are buried. The Russian Orthodox Church refers to the book of the Kolchak investigator Nikolai Sokolov, who concluded that all the bodies were burned.
Some of the remains collected by Sokolov at the place of burning are stored in Brussels, in the church of St. Job the Long-suffering, and they have not been examined. At one time, a version of the note by Yurovsky, who supervised the execution and burial, was found - it became the main document before the transfer of the remains (along with the book of the investigator Sokolov). And now, in the upcoming year of the 100th anniversary of the execution of the Romanov family, the Russian Orthodox Church has been instructed to give a final answer to all the dark places of execution near Yekaterinburg. To obtain a final answer under the auspices of the Russian Orthodox Church, research has been conducted for several years. Once again, historians, geneticists, graphologists, pathologists and other specialists are rechecking the facts, again powerful scientific forces and the powers of the prosecutor's office are involved, and all these actions again take place under a dense veil of secrecy.
Research on genetic identification is carried out by four independent groups of scientists. Two of them are foreign, working directly with the ROC. In early July 2017, Bishop Tikhon (Shevkunov) of Yegoryevsky, the secretary of the church commission for studying the results of the study of the remains found near Yekaterinburg, said: a large number of new circumstances and new documents were discovered. For example, Sverdlov's order to execute Nicholas II was found. In addition, according to the results of recent research, forensic scientists confirmed that the remains of the king and queen belong to them, since a trace was suddenly found on the skull of Nicholas II, which is interpreted as a trace from a saber blow he received when visiting Japan. As for the queen, dentists identified her by the world's first porcelain veneers on platinum pins.
Although, if you open the conclusion of the commission, written before the burial in 1998, it says: the bones of the sovereign's skull are so destroyed that the characteristic callus cannot be found. The same conclusion noted severe damage to the teeth of the alleged remains of Nikolai by periodontal disease, since this person had never been to the dentist. This confirms that it was not the tsar who was shot, since the records of the Tobolsk dentist, whom Nikolai turned to, remained. In addition, the fact that the growth of the skeleton of "Princess Anastasia" is 13 centimeters larger than her lifetime growth has not yet been found. Well, as you know, miracles happen in the church ... Shevkunov did not say a word about genetic examination, and this despite the fact that the genetic studies of 2003, conducted by Russian and American specialists, showed that the genome of the body of the alleged empress and her sister Elizabeth Feodorovna do not match , which means no relationship
In addition, in the museum of the city of Otsu (Japan) there are things left after the injury of the policeman Nicholas II. They have biological material that can be examined. According to them, Japanese geneticists from the Tatsuo Nagai group proved that the DNA of the remains of "Nicholas II" from near Yekaterinburg (and his family) does not 100% match the DNA of biomaterials from Japan. During the Russian DNA examination, second cousins were compared, and in the conclusion it was written that "there are matches." The Japanese compared relatives of cousins. There are also the results of a genetic examination of the President of the International Association of Forensic Physicians, Mr. Bonte from Dusseldorf, in which he proved that the found remains and twins of the family of Nicholas II Filatov are relatives. Perhaps, from their remains in 1946, the “remains of the royal family” were created? The problem has not been studied.
Earlier, in 1998, the Russian Orthodox Church, on the basis of these conclusions and facts, did not recognize the existing remains as authentic, but what will happen now? In December, all the conclusions of the Investigative Committee and the commission of the Russian Orthodox Church will be considered by the Council of Bishops. It is he who will decide on the attitude of the church to the Yekaterinburg remains. Let's see why everything is so nervous and what is the history of this crime?
Worth the fight for that kind of money
Today, some of the Russian elites have suddenly awakened interest in one very piquant story of relations between Russia and the United States, connected with the Romanov royal family. Briefly, the story is as follows: more than 100 years ago, in 1913, the US created the Federal Reserve System (FRS) - the central bank and printing press for the production of international currency, which still operates today. The Fed was created for the emerging League of Nations (now the UN) and would be a single world financial center with its own currency. Russia contributed 48,600 tons of gold to the "authorized capital" of the system. But the Rothschilds demanded that Woodrow Wilson, who was then re-elected as President of the United States, transfer the center to their private property along with gold. The organization became known as the Fed, where Russia owned 88.8%, and 11.2% - 43 international beneficiaries. Receipts stating that 88.8% of gold assets for a period of 99 years are under the control of the Rothschilds, six copies were transferred to the family of Nicholas II.
The annual income on these deposits was fixed at 4%, which was supposed to be transferred to Russia annually, but settled on the X-1786 account of the World Bank and on 300 thousand accounts in 72 international banks. All these documents confirming the right to 48,600 tons of gold pledged to the FRS from Russia, as well as income from leasing it, the mother of Tsar Nicholas II, Maria Fedorovna Romanova, deposited in one of the Swiss banks. But the conditions for access there are only for the heirs, and this access is controlled by the Rothschild clan. For the gold provided by Russia, gold certificates were issued that allowed the metal to be claimed in parts - the royal family hid them in different places. Later, in 1944, the Bretton Woods Conference confirmed Russia's right to 88% of the Fed's assets.
This “golden” issue was once proposed by two well-known Russian oligarchs – Roman Abramovich and Boris Berezovsky. But Yeltsin "did not understand" them, and now, apparently, that very "golden" time has come ... And now this gold is remembered more and more often - though not at the state level.
Some speculate that the surviving Tsarevich Alexei later grew up to be Soviet Prime Minister Alexei Kosygin.
For this gold they kill, fight and make fortunes on it
Today's researchers believe that all wars and revolutions in Russia and in the world occurred due to the fact that the Rothschild clan and the United States did not intend to return the gold to the Russian Federal Reserve. After all, the execution of the royal family made it possible for the Rothschild clan not to give away gold and not pay for its 99-year lease. “Now, out of three Russian copies of the agreement on gold invested in the Fed, two are in our country, the third is presumably in one of the Swiss banks,” researcher Sergei Zhilenkov believes. - In the cache, in the Nizhny Novgorod region, there are documents from the royal archive, among which there are 12 "golden" certificates. If they are presented, then the global financial hegemony of the United States and the Rothschilds will simply collapse, and our country will receive a lot of money and all the opportunities for development, since it will no longer be strangled from across the ocean, ”the historian is sure.
Many wanted to close questions about royal assets with the reburial. Professor Vladlen Sirotkin also has an estimate for the so-called military gold exported to the West and East during the First World War and the Civil War: Japan - 80 billion dollars, Great Britain - 50 billion, France - 25 billion, USA - 23 billion, Sweden - 5 billion, the Czech Republic - $1 billion. Total - 184 billion. Surprisingly, officials in the US and UK, for example, do not dispute these figures, but are surprised at the lack of requests from Russia. By the way, the Bolsheviks remembered Russian assets in the West in the early 20s. Back in 1923, People's Commissar for Foreign Trade Leonid Krasin ordered a British law firm to evaluate Russian real estate and cash deposits abroad. By 1993, the firm reported that it had amassed a $400 billion data bank! And this is legal Russian money.
Why did the Romanovs die? Britain did not accept them!
There is a long-term study, unfortunately, by the now deceased professor Vladlen Sirotkin (MGIMO), “Foreign Gold of Russia” (M., 2000), where the gold and other holdings of the Romanov family accumulated in the accounts of Western banks are also estimated at an amount of at least 400 billion dollars, and together with investments - more than 2 trillion dollars! In the absence of Romanov heirs, the closest relatives turn out to be members of the English royal family... These are the interests of which may be the background of many events of the 19th-21st centuries...
By the way, it is not clear (or, on the contrary, it is understandable) for what reasons the royal house of England denied asylum three times to the Romanov family. The first time in 1916, at the apartment of Maxim Gorky, an escape was planned - the rescue of the Romanovs by abduction and the internment of the royal couple during their visit to an English warship, then sent to Great Britain. The second was Kerensky's request, which was also rejected. Then they did not accept the request of the Bolsheviks. And this despite the fact that the mothers of George V and Nicholas II were sisters. In the surviving correspondence, Nicholas II and George V call each other "Cousin Nicky" and "Cousin Georgie" - they were cousins with an age difference of less than three years, and in their youth these guys spent a lot of time together and were very similar in appearance. As for the queen, her mother, Princess Alice, was the eldest and beloved daughter of the English Queen Victoria. At that time, 440 tons of gold from the gold reserves of Russia and 5.5 tons of personal gold of Nicholas II were in England as collateral for military loans. Now think about it: if the royal family died, then to whom would the gold go? Close relatives! Isn't that the reason why Cousin Georgie was denied admission to Cousin Nicky's family? To get gold, its owners had to die. Officially. And now all this must be connected with the burial of the royal family, which will officially testify that the owners of untold wealth are dead.
Versions of life after death
All versions of the death of the royal family that exist today can be divided into three. The first version: the royal family was shot near Yekaterinburg, and their remains, with the exception of Alexei and Maria, were reburied in St. Petersburg. The remains of these children were found in 2007, all examinations were carried out on them, and they, apparently, will be buried on the day of the 100th anniversary of the tragedy. When confirming this version, it is necessary for accuracy to once again identify all the remains and repeat all examinations, especially genetic and pathological anatomical ones. The second version: the royal family was not shot, but was scattered throughout Russia and all family members died of natural causes, having lived their lives in Russia or abroad, in Yekaterinburg, a family of twins was shot (members of the same family or people from different families, but similar members of the emperor's family). Nicholas II had twins after Bloody Sunday 1905. When leaving the palace, three carriages left. In which of them Nicholas II sat is unknown. The Bolsheviks, having seized the archive of the 3rd department in 1917, had these twins. There is an assumption that one of the families of twins - the Filatovs, who are distantly related to the Romanovs - followed them to Tobolsk. The third version: the secret services added false remains to the burial places of members of the royal family as they died naturally or before opening the grave. For this, it is necessary to carefully track, among other things, the age of the biomaterial.
Here is one of the versions of the historian of the royal family, Sergei Zhelenkov, which seems to us the most logical, although very unusual.
Before investigator Sokolov, the only investigator who published a book about the execution of the royal family, worked investigators Malinovsky, Nametkin (his archive was burned along with his house), Sergeev (dismissed from the case and killed), Lieutenant General Diterikhs, Kirsta. All these investigators concluded that the royal family was not killed. Neither the Reds nor the Whites wanted to disclose this information - they understood that the American bankers were primarily interested in obtaining objective information. The Bolsheviks were interested in the money of the king, and Kolchak declared himself the Supreme Ruler of Russia, which could not be with a living sovereign.
Investigator Sokolov conducted two cases - one on the fact of the murder and the other on the fact of the disappearance. In parallel, military intelligence in the person of Kirst conducted an investigation. When the whites left Russia, Sokolov, fearing for the collected materials, sent them to Harbin - some of his materials were lost along the way. Sokolov's materials contained evidence of the financing of the Russian revolution by the American bankers Schiff, Kuhn and Loeb, and Ford became interested in these materials, in conflict with these bankers. He even called Sokolov from France, where he settled, to the USA. When returning from the USA to France, Nikolai Sokolov was killed.
Sokolov's book came out after his death, and many people "worked" on it, removing many scandalous facts from there, so it cannot be considered completely truthful. The surviving members of the royal family were watched by people from the KGB, where a special department was created for this, which was dissolved during perestroika. The archive of this department has been preserved. The royal family was saved by Stalin - the royal family was evacuated from Yekaterinburg through Perm to Moscow and fell into the hands of Trotsky, then People's Commissar of Defense. To further save the royal family, Stalin carried out a whole operation, stealing it from Trotsky's people and taking them to Sukhumi, to a specially built house next to the former house of the royal family. From there, all family members were distributed to different places, Maria and Anastasia were taken to the Glinskaya Hermitage (Sumy Region), then Maria was transported to the Nizhny Novgorod Region, where she died of illness on May 24, 1954. Anastasia subsequently married Stalin's personal bodyguard and lived very secluded on a small farm, died on June 27, 1980 in the Volgograd region.
The eldest daughters, Olga and Tatyana, were sent to the Serafimo-Diveevsky convent - the empress was settled not far from the girls. But they did not live here for long. Olga, having traveled through Afghanistan, Europe and Finland, settled in Vyritsa, Leningrad Region, where she died on January 19, 1976. Tatyana lived partly in Georgia, partly in the territory of the Krasnodar Territory, was buried in the Krasnodar Territory, died on September 21, 1992. Alexei and his mother lived in their dacha, then Alexei was transferred to Leningrad, where he was “made” a biography, and the whole world recognized him as a party and Soviet leader Alexei Nikolaevich Kosygin (Stalin sometimes called him a prince in front of everyone). Nicholas II lived and died in Nizhny Novgorod (December 22, 1958), and the tsarina died in the village of Starobelskaya, Lugansk region, on April 2, 1948, and was subsequently reburied in Nizhny Novgorod, where she and the emperor share a common grave. Three daughters of Nicholas II, except for Olga, had children. N.A. Romanov talked with I.V. Stalin, and the wealth of the Russian Empire was used to strengthen the power of the USSR ...
Yakov Tudorovsky
Yakov Tudorovsky
The Romanovs were not shot
According to official history, on the night of July 16-17, 1918, Nikolai Romanov, along with his wife and children, was shot. After the burial was opened and identified, the remains were reburied in 1998 in the tomb of the Peter and Paul Cathedral in St. Petersburg. However, then the ROC did not confirm their authenticity. “I cannot rule out that the church will recognize the royal remains as genuine if convincing evidence of their authenticity is found and if the examination is open and honest,” said Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk, head of the Department for External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate, in July this year. As you know, the Russian Orthodox Church did not participate in the burial of the remains of the royal family in 1998, explaining this by the fact that the church is not sure whether the true remains of the royal family are buried. The Russian Orthodox Church refers to the book of the Kolchak investigator Nikolai Sokolov, who concluded that all the bodies were burned. Some of the remains collected by Sokolov at the place of burning are stored in Brussels, in the church of St. Job the Long-suffering, and they have not been examined. At one time, a version of the note by Yurovsky, who supervised the execution and burial, was found - it became the main document before the transfer of the remains (along with the book of the investigator Sokolov). And now, in the upcoming year of the 100th anniversary of the execution of the Romanov family, the Russian Orthodox Church has been instructed to give a final answer to all the dark places of execution near Yekaterinburg. To obtain a final answer under the auspices of the Russian Orthodox Church, research has been conducted for several years. Once again, historians, geneticists, graphologists, pathologists and other specialists are rechecking the facts, again powerful scientific forces and the powers of the prosecutor's office are involved, and all these actions again take place under a dense veil of secrecy. Research on genetic identification is carried out by four independent groups of scientists. Two of them are foreign, working directly with the ROC. In early July 2017, Bishop Tikhon (Shevkunov) of Yegoryevsky, the secretary of the church commission for studying the results of the study of the remains found near Yekaterinburg, said: a large number of new circumstances and new documents were discovered. For example, Sverdlov's order to execute Nicholas II was found. In addition, according to the results of recent research, forensic scientists confirmed that the remains of the king and queen belong to them, since a trace was suddenly found on the skull of Nicholas II, which is interpreted as a trace from a saber blow he received when visiting Japan. As for the queen, dentists identified her by the world's first porcelain veneers on platinum pins. Although, if you open the conclusion of the commission, written before the burial in 1998, it says: the bones of the sovereign's skull are so destroyed that the characteristic callus cannot be found. The same conclusion noted severe damage to the teeth of the alleged remains of Nikolai by periodontal disease, since this person had never been to the dentist. This confirms that it was not the tsar who was shot, since the records of the Tobolsk dentist, whom Nikolai turned to, remained. In addition, the fact that the growth of the skeleton of "Princess Anastasia" is 13 centimeters larger than her lifetime growth has not yet been found. Well, as you know, miracles happen in the church ... Shevkunov did not say a word about genetic examination, and this despite the fact that the genetic studies of 2003, conducted by Russian and American specialists, showed that the genome of the body of the alleged empress and her sister Elizabeth Feodorovna do not match , which means no relationship.
Yekaterinburg on the night of July 17, 1918, the Bolsheviks shot Nicholas II, his entire family (wife, son, four daughters) and servants.
But the murder of the royal family was not an execution in the usual sense: a volley - and the condemned fall dead. Only Nicholas II and his wife quickly died - the rest, due to the chaos in the execution room, waited for death for several more minutes. The 13-year-old son of Alexei, the daughters and servants of the emperor were shot in the head and stabbed with bayonets. How all this horror happened - will tell HistoryTime.
Reconstruction
The Ipatiev House, where the terrible events took place, has been recreated in the Sverdlovsk Regional Museum of Local Lore in a 3D computer model. Virtual reconstruction allows you to walk through the premises of the "last palace" of the emperor, look into the rooms where he lived, Alexandra Fedorovna, their children, servants, go out into the courtyard, go into the rooms on the first floor (where the guards lived) and into the so-called execution room, in which the king and family were martyred.
The situation in the house was recreated to the smallest detail (down to the paintings on the walls, the sentry machine gun in the corridor and the bullet holes in the “execution room”) on the basis of documents (including protocols for inspecting the house made by representatives of the “white” investigation), old photos, and as well as interior details that have survived to this day thanks to museum workers: the Historical and Revolutionary Museum was in the Ipatiev House for a long time, and before being demolished in 1977, its employees were able to remove and save some items.
For example, the pillars from the stairs to the second floor or the fireplace, near which the emperor smoked (it was forbidden to leave the house), were preserved. Now all these things are on display in the Romanovs' Hall of the Museum of Local Lore. " The most valuable exhibit of our exposition is the grate that stood in the window of the "execution room", - says the creator of the 3D reconstruction, head of the department of the history of the Romanov dynasty of the museum, Nikolai Neuimin. - She is a mute witness to those terrible events.”
In July 1918, "red" Yekaterinburg was preparing for evacuation: the White Guards were approaching the city. Realizing that taking the tsar and his family away from Yekaterinburg is dangerous for the young revolutionary republic (on the road it would be impossible to provide the imperial family with the same good protection as in the Ipatiev house, and Nicholas II could easily be beaten off by the monarchists), the leaders of the Bolshevik party decide to destroy the tsar along with children and servants.
On the fateful night, having waited for the final order from Moscow (the car brought him at half past one in the night), the commandant of the "special purpose house" Yakov Yurovsky ordered Dr. Botkin to wake Nikolai and his family.
Until the last minute, they did not know that they would be killed: they were told that they were being transferred to another place for security reasons, as the city became restless - there was an evacuation due to the advance of the white troops.
The room they were taken to was empty: there was no furniture - only two chairs were brought. The famous note of the commandant of the "House of Special Purpose" Yurovsky, who commanded the execution, reads:
Nikolay put Alexei on one, Alexandra Fedorovna sat on the other. The rest of the commandant ordered to stand in a row. ... He told the Romanovs that in view of the fact that their relatives in Europe continue to attack Soviet Russia, the Urals Executive Committee decided to shoot them. Nikolai turned his back on the team, facing the family, then, as if coming to his senses, turned around with the question: “What? What?".
According to Neuimin, the short “Yurovsky Note” (written in 1920 by the historian Pokrovsky under the dictation of a revolutionary) is an important, but not the best document. Yurovsky's "Memoirs" (1922) and, especially, in the transcript of his speech at the secret meeting of the old Bolsheviks in Yekaterinburg (1934) are told much more fully about the execution and subsequent events. There are also memories of other participants in the execution: in 1963-1964, the KGB, on behalf of the Central Committee of the CPSU, interrogated all the survivors of them. " Their words echo those of Yurovsky over the years: they all say roughly the same thing.", - says a museum employee.
Execution
According to commandant Yurovsky, things did not go at all as he had planned. " His idea was that in this room there is a wall plastered with wooden blocks, and there will be no ricochet, - says Neuimin. - But a little higher are concrete vaults. The revolutionaries fired aimlessly, the bullets began to hit the concrete and bounce. Yurovsky says that in the midst of it he was forced to give the command to cease fire: one bullet flew over his ear, and the other hit a comrade in the finger».
Yurovsky recalled in 1922:
For a long time I could not stop this shooting, which had taken on a careless character. But when I finally managed to stop, I saw that many were still alive. For example, Dr. Botkin was lying, leaning on the elbow of his right hand, as if in the pose of a rest, finished him off with a revolver shot. Alexei, Tatyana, Anastasia and Olga were also alive. Demidov's maid was also alive.
The fact that despite the long firing, the members of the royal family remained alive is simply explained.
It was distributed in advance who would shoot whom, but most of the revolutionaries began to shoot at the "tyrant" - at Nikolai. " In the wake of revolutionary hysteria, they believed that he was a crowned executioner- says Neuimin. - Liberal-democratic propaganda, starting from the revolution of 1905, wrote such things about Nicholas! Postcards were issued - Alexandra Feodorovna with Rasputin, Nicholas II with huge branched horns, in the Ipatiev house all the walls were inscriptions on this topic».
Yurovsky wanted everything to be unexpected for the royal family, so those whom the family knew (most likely) entered the room: commandant Yurovsky himself, his assistant Nikulin, head of security Pavel Medvedev. The rest of the executioners stood in the doorway in three rows.
In addition, Yurovsky did not take into account the size of the room (approximately 4.5 by 5.5 meters): the members of the royal family settled down in it, but there was no longer enough space for the executioners, and they stood one behind the other. There is an assumption that only three were standing inside the room - those whom the royal family knew (commandant Yurovsky, his assistant Grigory Nikulin and head of security Pavel Medvedev), two more stood in the doorway, the rest behind them. Aleksey Kabanov, for example, recalls that he stood in the third row and fired, sticking his hand with a pistol between the shoulders of his comrades.
He also says that when he finally entered the room, he saw that Medvedev (Kudrin), Ermakov and Yurovsky were standing “above the girls” and were shooting at them from above. Ballistic examination confirmed that Olga, Tatyana and Maria (except Anastasia) had bullet wounds to the head. Yurovsky writes:
Tov. Ermakov wanted to finish the job with a bayonet. But, however, it did not work. The reason became clear later (the daughters were wearing diamond shells like bras). I had to shoot each one in turn.
When the shooting stopped, it turned out that Aleksey was alive on the floor - it turns out that no one had shot at him (Nikulin was supposed to shoot, but he later said that he could not, because he liked Alyoshka - a couple of days before the execution he carved a wooden pipe). The prince was in a swoon, but he was breathing - and Yurovsky also shot him point-blank in the head.
Agony
When it seemed that everything was over, a female figure (maid Anna Demidova) rose in the corner with a pillow in her hands. With a cry " Thank God! God saved me!(all bullets lodged in the pillow) she tried to run away. But the ammo ran out. Later, Yurovsky said that Ermakov, they say, well done, did not lose his head - he ran out into the corridor, where Strekotin was standing at the machine gun, grabbed his rifle and began to poke the maid with a bayonet. She groaned for a long time and did not die.
The Bolsheviks began to carry the bodies of the dead into the corridor. At this time, one of the girls - Anastasia - sat down and screamed wildly, realizing what had happened (it turns out that she fainted during the execution). " Then Ermakov pierced her - she died the last most painful death", - says Nikolai Neuimin.
Kabanov says that he got "the hardest" thing - to kill dogs (before the execution, Tatyana had a French bulldog in her arms, and Anastasia had a dog named Jimmy).
Medvedev (Kudrin) writes that the "triumphant Kabanov" came out with a rifle in his hand, on the bayonet of which two dogs dangled, and with the words "to dogs - dog death" threw them into the truck, where the corpses of members of the royal family were already lying.
During interrogation, Kabanov said that he barely pierced the animals with a bayonet, but, as it turned out, he lied: in the well of mine No. he stabbed the animal, and finished off the other with the butt.
All this terrible agony lasted, according to various researchers, up to half an hour, and even some hardened revolutionaries could not stand the nerves. Neumin says:
There, in the house of Ipatiev, there was a guard Dobrynin, who abandoned his post and ran away. There was the head of the external guard, Pavel Spiridonovich Medvedev, who was put in charge of all the guards of the house (he is not a Chekist, but a Bolshevik who fought, and they trusted him). Medvedev-Kudrin writes that Pavel fell during the execution, then began crawling out of the room on all fours. When his comrades asked what was the matter with him (whether he was wounded), he swore dirtyly, and he began to feel sick.
The Sverdlovsk museum exhibits pistols used by the Bolsheviks: three revolvers (analogues) and a Mauser by Pyotr Ermakov. The last exhibit is a genuine weapon from which the royal family was killed (there is an act of 1927, when Yermakov handed over his weapon). Another proof that this is the same weapon is a photograph of a group of party leaders at the hiding place of the remains of the royal family in Piglet Log (taken in 2014).
On it are the leaders of the Ural regional executive committee and the regional party committee (the majority were shot in 1937-38). Ermakova's Mauser lies right on the sleepers - over the heads of the murdered and buried members of the royal family, the burial place of which was never found by the "white" investigation and which only half a century later was discovered by the Ural geologist Alexander Avdonin.
Interview with Vladimir Sychev on the Romanov case
In June 1987 I was in Venice with the French press accompanying François Mitterrand to the G7 summit. During the breaks between pools, an Italian journalist approached me and asked me something in French. Realizing from my accent that I was not French, he looked at my French accreditation and asked where I was from. - Russian, - I answered. - That's how? - my interlocutor was surprised. Under his arm, he held an Italian newspaper, from where he translated a huge, half-page article.
Sister Pascalina dies in a private clinic in Switzerland. She was known throughout the Catholic world, because. passed with the future Pope Pius XXII from 1917, when he was still Cardinal Pacelli in Munich (Bavaria), until his death in the Vatican in 1958. She had such a strong influence on him that he entrusted the entire administration of the Vatican to her, and when the cardinals asked for an audience with the Pope, she decided who was worthy of such an audience and who was not. This is a short retelling of a large article, the meaning of which was that the phrase uttered at the end and not a mere mortal, we had to believe. Sister Pascalina asked to invite a lawyer and witnesses, as she did not want to take her to the grave the secret of your life. When they arrived, she only said that the woman buried in the village Morcote, near Lake Maggiore - indeed daughter of the Russian Tsar - Olga!!
I convinced my Italian colleague that this was a gift from Fate and that it was useless to resist it. Having learned that he was from Milan, I told him that I would not fly back to Paris on the presidential press plane, but we would go to this village for half a day. We went there after the summit. It turned out that this was no longer Italy, but Switzerland, but we quickly found a village, a cemetery and a cemetery watchman who led us to the grave. On the gravestone is a photograph of an elderly woman and an inscription in German: Olga Nikolaevna(without a surname), the eldest daughter of Nikolai Romanov, Tsar of Russia, and dates of life - 1985-1976 !!!
The Italian journalist was an excellent translator for me, but he clearly did not want to stay there for the whole day. I had to ask questions.
When did she move in here? - In 1948.
She said that she is the daughter of the Russian Tsar? - Of course, and the whole village knew about it.
Did it get into the press? - Yes.
How did the other Romanovs react to this? Did they sue? - Served.
And did she lose? - Yes, I lost.
In this case, she had to pay the opposing party's legal costs. - She paid.
She worked? - Not.
Where does she get the money from? - Yes, the whole village knew that the Vatican contained it !!
The ring is closed. I went to Paris and began to look for what is known on this issue ... And quickly came across a book by two English journalists.
Tom Mangold and Anthony Summers published a book in 1979 "Dossier on the king"(“The Case of the Romanovs, or the execution that never happened”). They began with the fact that if the secrecy stamp is removed from state archives after 60 years, then in 1978 60 years from the date of the signing of the Treaty of Versailles expire, and you can “dig up” something there by looking into the declassified archives. That is, at first there was an idea just to look ... And they very quickly got on telegrams English ambassador to his Foreign Office that the royal family was taken from Yekaterinburg to Perm. There is no need to explain to professionals from the BBC that this is a sensation. They rushed to Berlin.
It quickly became clear that the Whites, having entered Yekaterinburg on July 25, immediately appointed an investigator to investigate the execution of the royal family. Nikolai Sokolov, whose book everyone still refers to, is the third investigator who received the case only at the end of February 1919! Then a simple question arises: who were the first two and what did they report to the authorities? So, the first investigator named Nametkin, appointed by Kolchak, having worked for three months and declaring that he is a professional, is a simple matter, and he does not need additional time (and the Whites were advancing and had no doubts about their victory at that time - i.e. all the time is yours, don’t rush, work!), puts a report on the table that there was no shooting, but there was a staged execution. Kolchak this report - under the cloth and appoints a second investigator by the name of Sergeev. He also works for three months and at the end of February gives Kolchak the same report with the same words (“I am a professional, it’s a simple matter, no extra time is needed,” there was no shooting- there was a staged execution).
Here it is necessary to explain and remind that it was the Whites who overthrew the tsar, and not the Reds, and they sent him into exile in Siberia! Lenin in these February days was in Zurich. Whatever ordinary soldiers say, the white elite are not monarchists, but republicans. And Kolchak did not need a living tsar. I advise those who have doubts to read Trotsky's diaries, where he writes that "if the whites put up any tsar - even a peasant one - we would not have lasted even two weeks"! These are the words of the Supreme Commander of the Red Army and the ideologist of the Red Terror!! Please believe.
Therefore, Kolchak already puts "his" investigator Nikolai Sokolov and gives him a task. And Nikolai Sokolov also works for only three months - but for a different reason. The Reds entered Yekaterinburg in May, and he retreated along with the Whites. He took the archives, but what did he write?
1. He did not find the bodies, and for the police of any country in any system "no bodies - no murder" - this is a disappearance! After all, when arresting serial killers, the police demand to show where the corpses are hidden !! You can say whatever you want, even at yourself, and the investigator needs material evidence!
And Nikolai Sokolov "hangs the first noodles on his ears": “thrown into a mine, filled with acid”. Now they prefer to forget this phrase, but we heard it until 1998! And for some reason no one ever doubted. Is it possible to flood the mine with acid? But acid is not enough! In the local history museum of Yekaterinburg, where the director Avdonin (the same, one of the three who “accidentally” found bones on the Starokotlyakovskaya road, cleared to them by three investigators in 1918-19), hangs a certificate about those soldiers on the truck that they had 78 liters of gasoline (not acid). In July, in the Siberian taiga, having 78 liters of gasoline, you can burn the entire Moscow zoo! No, they went back and forth, first they threw it into the mine, poured it with acid, and then they took it out and hid it under the sleepers ...
By the way, on the night of the "execution" from July 16 to July 17, 1918, a huge train with the entire local Red Army, the local Central Committee and the local Cheka left Yekaterinburg for Perm. The Whites entered on the eighth day, and Yurovsky, Beloborodov and his comrades shifted the responsibility to two soldiers? The inconsistency, - tea, they did not deal with a peasant revolt. And if they shot at their own discretion, they could have done it a month earlier.
2. The second "noodle" of Nikolai Sokolov - he describes the basement of the Ipatievsky house, publishes photographs where it is clear that bullets are in the walls and in the ceiling (apparently, they do this when staging an execution). Conclusion - women's corsets were stuffed with diamonds, and the bullets ricocheted! So, like this: the king from the throne and into exile in Siberia. Money in England and Switzerland, and they sew diamonds into corsets to sell to peasants in the market? Well well!
3. In the same book by Nikolai Sokolov, the same basement in the same Ipatiev house is described, where in the fireplace lies clothes from each member of the imperial family and hair from each head. Were they sheared and changed (undressed??) before being shot? Not at all - they were taken out by the same train on that same "night of execution", but they cut their hair and changed clothes so that no one would recognize them there.
Tom Magold and Anthony Summers intuitively realized that the clue to this intriguing detective story must be sought in Brest Peace Treaty. And they began to look for the original text. And what?? With all the removal of secrets after 60 years of such an official document nowhere! It is not in the declassified archives of London or Berlin. They searched everywhere - and everywhere they found only quotes, but nowhere could they find the full text! And they came to the conclusion that the Kaiser demanded the extradition of women from Lenin. The tsar's wife is a relative of the Kaiser, the daughters are German citizens and did not have the right to the throne, and besides, the Kaiser at that moment could crush Lenin like a bug! And here are Lenin's words that "the world is humiliating and obscene, but it must be signed", and the July coup attempt of the Socialist-Revolutionaries with Dzerzhinsky, who joined them at the Bolshoi Theater, take on a completely different look.
Officially, we were taught that the Trotsky treaty was signed only on the second attempt and only after the start of the offensive of the German army, when it became clear to everyone that the Republic of Soviets could not resist. If there is simply no army, what is “humiliating and obscene” here? Nothing. But if it is necessary to hand over all the women of the royal family, and even to the Germans, and even during the First World War, then ideologically everything is in its place, and the words are read correctly. What Lenin did, and the entire ladies' section was handed over to the Germans in Kiev. And immediately the murder of the German ambassador Mirbach in Moscow and the German consul in Kiev makes sense.
"Dossier on the Tsar" is a fascinating investigation into one cunningly tangled intrigue of world history. The book was published in 1979, so the words of Sister Pascalina in 1983 about Olga's grave could not get into it. And if there were no new facts, then simply retelling someone else's book here would not make sense ...